Jump to content

Recommended Posts

yep def - it does work out a bit cheaper to get the litre cartons of SMA but still of course dearer than the powder. We just took the decision that if there was any element of the whole baby maelstrom we could actually make easier, we'd do it (within reason!). It's only for six months, then you're using less milk and after he was 11 months he was onto cows milk.

Fuschia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> veryseriousgirl Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> A nurse from NHS direct

> > confirmed that it's perfectly OK to keep boiled

> > water in sterilised bottles for up to 24 hours

> at

> > room temp or 48 hours in the fridge. When you

> > want to use them, heat them to the temp you

> want

> > to feed them to baby at, then add the powder at

> > the last minute. You don't need to heat them

> if

> > your baby will accept formula at room temp

>

> I'm afraid that is NOT the advice that is now

> issued, after some incidents with contaminated

> formula powder and is another case of individual

> NHS staff straying away from the official

> position. Really, HOT water is needed to "scald"

> the powder... have a look at the FSA link I

> posted...



We've just started doing this after an NHS direct nurse told me to do it over the phone last week. Previously I had been making all feeds up for the day at once (with scalding hot water), rapidly cooling them and refrigerating them until I needed them. The nurse told me the cooled water was better as it didn't give bacteria the time / material in which to multiply. There is so much contradictory advice out there that it's hard to know which to take.

veryseriousgirl Wrote:


The nurse told me the cooled water was

> better as it didn't give bacteria the time /

> material in which to multiply. There is so much

> contradictory advice out there that it's hard to

> know which to take.


The Food Standards Authority and the detailed research into the bacteria that can live in formula powder is what I'd trust, I'm afraid an NHS direct nurse can't really expect to be an authority to go against the research!

Fuschia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> The Food Standards Authority and the detailed

> research into the bacteria that can live in

> formula powder is what I'd trust, I'm afraid an

> NHS direct nurse can't really expect to be an

> authority to go against the research!



Fair enough. The whole reason I phoned NHS direct was that the locum at my GP had told me earlier in the day to replace all her milk feeds with dioralyte for 24 - 48 hours and to give her baby rice if she got hungry (at 15 weeks). I thought that advice was insane enough that I wanted a second opinion.

veryseriousgirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> Fair enough. The whole reason I phoned NHS direct

> was that the locum at my GP had told me earlier in

> the day to replace all her milk feeds with

> dioralyte for 24 - 48 hours and to give her baby

> rice if she got hungry (at 15 weeks). I thought

> that advice was insane enough that I wanted a

> second opinion.


Yes, that's nonsense too. It's scary that so many people get away with peddling incorrect and dangerous info when they are supposed to be the experts.

Fuschia is right that the water needs to be hot when it goes in the powder because the powder isn't sterile. Officially it needs to be at least 70C, but since most people won't have a temperature probe and even if they do won't want to be using it all the time, then the advice is to boil fresh tap water in the kettle and leave it to cool for NO MORE than 30 mins. Of course how quickly the water cools depends on the type of kettle and how much water you've put in it. If you put in at least 1 litre then cooling it for no more than 30 mins means the water will probably still be hot enough to kill the bugs. I know it sounds rather prescriptive, but all of this is an attempt to interpret the available evidence into something that's reasonably practical in the real world. The FSA is doing more research into this area at the moment. Of course, it's important to make sure that the milk is not too hot for the baby before feeding it - it's meant to be about body temp. It's also important not to keep made-up formula hanging around at room temp for longer than a couple of hours.
And there's nothing wrong with formula! As somebody who felt desperately guilty when forced to do mixed feeding because of my son's plummeting weight, I now know that life is way too short to beat yourself up if breastfeeding doesn't work out for you. There can be loads of reasons that it doesn't. It's always worth getting help with technique etc but if you have tried everything, and I really did, then you should never feel second best for using bottles. Good luck.

edanna Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fuschia is right that the water needs to be hot

> when it goes in the powder because the powder

> isn't sterile. Officially it needs to be at least

> 70C, but since most people won't have a

> temperature probe and even if they do won't want

> to be using it all the time, then the advice is to

> boil fresh tap water in the kettle and leave it to

> cool for NO MORE than 30 mins. Of course how

> quickly the water cools depends on the type of

> kettle and how much water you've put in it. If you

> put in at least 1 litre then cooling it for no

> more than 30 mins means the water will probably

> still be hot enough to kill the bugs. I know it

> sounds rather prescriptive, but all of this is an

> attempt to interpret the available evidence into

> something that's reasonably practical in the real

> world. The FSA is doing more research into this

> area at the moment. Of course, it's important to

> make sure that the milk is not too hot for the

> baby before feeding it - it's meant to be about

> body temp. It's also important not to keep made-up

> formula hanging around at room temp for longer

> than a couple of hours.


Yes: http://nctwatch.wordpress.com/2010/03/01/foods-standards-agency-reminds-parents-of-advice-on-making-up-infant-formula/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you for clarifying, James. So why would anybody want to take this on as a franchise if it is staying in this building? If it is now to be a sub office, does that mean that much of  the space could be used as a different kind of business altogether, with just part of it being used as a sub Post Office? Because if it is all to remain solely for Post Office business, (albeit as a sub Post Office it won't be providing all the services which it currently does) I can't see who would want to take it over? If it isn't profitable as a Crown office, how could it be  profitable running just as a sub office, even if staff are being paid less and it's opening for longer hours? Because presumably all the other overheads such as rent will remain the same?
    • Girobank was genuinely innovative, regarding the addressed customer base (significantly the previously unbanked) - but this would have been an ideally outsourced operation to an existing bank which already had the operational systems (and the regulatory experts) to manage a bank for someone else at marginal cost. The Post Office - when you consider the issues over the Horizon software - never originally designed by ICL/ Fujitsu for the application it ran - is a very good reason why the Post Office being involved in banking was long-term a bad idea.  To get back to the topic of this thread, the Horizon debacle is still not over (the software system is still in place) - most of the wrongly penalised sub-postmasters are still out of pocket - I'm not sure I would be leaping to take on the franchise being offered in Lordship Lane.
    • Otherwise in Bellenden Road are brilliant! They’ve made me stage dresses, restructured vintage finds and are working on remodelling my late brothers huntsman tweed suit for my modern husband! Not cheap and rents have meant they are moving premises at mo.
    • Penguin, I broadly agree, except that the Girobank was a genuinely innovative and successful operation. It’s rather ironic that after all these years we are now back to banking at the Post Office due to all the bank branch closures.  I agree that the roots of the problem go back further than 2012 (?), when the PO and RM were separated so RM could be sold. I’m willing to blame Peter Mandelson, Margaret Thatcher or even Keith Joseph. But none of them will be standing for the local council, hoping to make capital out of the possible closure of Lordship Lane PO, as if they are in no way responsible. The Lib Dems can’t be let off the hook that easily.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...