Jump to content

Recommended Posts

As you know.. football can kick itself up the arse all day long for all I care (generally speaking - World Cup excepted, of course).


But I'm interested in the Football Casuals thing.

Who 'woz there'?


Was violence an essential part of the thing, or limited to a small minority?


How important was the football?


Do we have MDMA to thank for the end of off-pitch bovver?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10362-football-casuals/
Share on other sites

Who 'woz there'?


I was


Was violence an essential part of the thing, or limited to a small minority?


The 'thing' moved from ritualised relatively harmless posturing/territorialism that was a significant part of the whole football experience for a reasonably large number of young football fans to a smaller minority when it became far more nasty and for that reason I was out


How important was the football?


Very for most


Do we have MDMA to thank for the end of off-pitch bovver?


Personally I think most people were realising how stupid it was, plus the 5 year sentences rather than ?50 fines and Aciiied just happened to coincide with that

What about the post Hillsborough move from terracing to all seated grounds? In Scotland that was the start of the end - it was harder to be hard when you were sitting down on a plastic chair.


At a Celtic vs Aberdeen game in 1988 at 13 years old I recall getting lifted into a coach by a policeman and told to take cover as bricks came through the windows in the away car park and a 200 strong pitch battle kicked off with poles, bricks and anything really. That stuff happened every week in arse end of Scottish council estates close to the ground and never made the news. For some reason the Aberdeen firm always had a rep with their "top boys" weirdly wearing Miami Dolphins shirts for a few seasons. It spawned its own labels /fashion - just like any gang or tribal culture but that was a bit odd I always thought.


Even up in Scotland we heard about the urban myth (?) of the Chelsea smile and the Chelsea Headhunters....all part of the folklore...some of it pretty nasty.

There's a lot of talk (and pictures) about the clothes online, but talk of 'rucking' (plus pictures) is never far behind.


So was 'football hooliganism' (as it became know) nothing more than the definitive gang culture of the age, no more than Teddy Boys, Gangstas etc etc? Or was it something else?

I saw a good film recently Quids about West Ham called 'The Firm'. It was out about about 6 months ago. The director was Nick Love I think. I thought it was pretty accurate and the fight scenes were quite realistic. Also the casual's fashions and music were on the money too.

ratty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not heard "dresser" since about 1985.


I think that tells you all you need to know about the whole cultural phenomena - as I noted on another thread, a movement of its time, and that time was about 1983ish (too early for me) to about 1992 (when I bailed out with my face and wardrobe largely intact) Anyone who tries to recreate what was a product of the times for the 21st century is a bit silly.


That said, I will always be a casual in terms of my love for performance fashion, classic British and European clothing and finding new and different clothes to stay looking fresh and impressive. One of the things that makes me cringe about these 21st century casuals is that they fall into one of two camps...


1. Daft kids who think that casual shorthand means fairly obvious Burberry, Acquascutum and moody Stone Island (all of which I have worn or still own, but when it was fresh, not worn out)


2. Old men who should know better and dress much like the above.


Me and my mates would not be seen dead looking like either of these creatures. None of us (OK, very few of us) have been anywhere near the sharp end of things for over 15 years, but we still have the casual aesthetic. The sort of brands we are likley to wear these days (because we still love performance fashion after all these years) are Woolen Mills, Engineered Garments, Barbour (still a classic), Superga (another classic) Yuketen and Quoddy handmade boots, Trickers and Grenson brogues, Sebago, Levis Vintage, CP Company (another timeless one), Albam, Clarks Originals, Filson, Fjallraven, Fox Umbrellas, Margaret Howell, Gitman Bros, Fracap, Gloverall, Nigel Cabourn, Mephisto, Norse Projects, S.N.S. Herning, Saint James, Guy Cotten, Universal Works, Ralph Lauren custom fit madras check, etc...


The sort of sportswear as sported in The Firm is pretty much rinsed out as far as we are concerned.


By the way, in response to Bob's original post as to the balance between clothes and fighting, generally depends on the person concerned I think. Contrary to popular belief casuals were actually a pretty broad church. From the above I think you can tell where my head was/is at. I couldn't wait for Acid House to give me an excuse to pack it in by the early 90s.


As I said, I will always have a casual aesthetic, and it defined me in my personal style, but Acid House made me a better person (hence the moniker) If you see someone knocking around East Dulwich or Peckham Rye wearing vintage Barbour and a natty line in handmade footwear and madras check shirting, It is very likely me, and I think you'd mostly find me very agreeable.


That's my point of view on it all.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There's a lot of talk (and pictures) about the

> clothes online, but talk of 'rucking' (plus

> pictures) is never far behind.

>

> So was 'football hooliganism' (as it became know)

> nothing more than the definitive gang culture of

> the age, no more than Teddy Boys, Gangstas etc

> etc? Or was it something else?

And youthculture


I was actually a soulboy rather than a casual, post punk about 1979 I decided to be a soulboy (a southern largely funk/jazz funk orientated scene rather than the more retro and more famous Northern soul scene concentrating on older obscure soul music) as a fair few of my mates were doing that and I liked the music and wanted to be in on a youth culture as punks moment had gone and the retro mod revival that was ongoing was just pathetic I thought and New Romantics were just London artschool types. Our 'look' then was largely very straight or 'pegged' jeans, legwarmers (yup!) flat shoes (not trainers) or plastic sandals/espadrilles in summer, white socks, various tops - Fred Perrys/baseball tops/Hawaiian shirts/tank tops and even cardigans! (it changed frequently) - but not especially sports casual?as the labels etc weren?t really available or relevant in the UK then. The main thing that identified a soulboy then was the wedge haircut, based on Bowie and Ferry 1976ish, I proudly got my first one in 1979.


Being a soulboy wasn't especially linked to Football, it was strongly linked to going clubbing (Goldmine Canvey Island, Flicks Dartford, Royalty Southgate being examples) and of course to the soul weekenders at Caister and the music. However, most soulboys were white southern suburban working class lads so many went to football. I remember that West Ham well into 1981/2 was still very much a post punk/oi/nu-skinhead look with Harringtons and loafers/DMs still much in evidence. The Southbank at Upton Park was still then pretty much green or black zipper Harrington?s and short hair. Suddenly in 82ish that look went and most youths started adopting a vague soulboy look and then added the sports casual Scouser thing too. I think the look just became more universal and the hooligans - and remember hooliganism had been around since the 1960s - adopted it. What then happened was that then it suddenly mattered that your lot looked better than the other lot and that accelerated the label/casual thing ? I just wasn?t into that then as fundamentally I was thinking we soulboys have had those flicky haircuts and cared about our clothes for years and you lot suddenly think you?re cool but I?m sure that just reflects my age. I was never a casual, my brother whose 7 years younger than me was.


So, casuals just became the universal look (and for a smaller elite a culture) for much workingclass youth and as Acid Casual said some of these went to football and some were hooligans too but the connection was as tenuous as that?Casual weren?t causal (see what I did there) in football violence.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Time will tell if H&B are loved or loathed, the footfall they get and generate will determine if they stay or go. That's the nature of businesses, they come and go dependant on usage. Examples are M&S, Poundland Local, Co-op, Superdrug, Mons, the chain restaurant/takeaways, the chain Estate Agents, Toolstation, Screwfix to name a few.  As much as people would like to see Lordship Lane remain a high street of independents, it is becoming clear that due to Landlords hiking rents, some are unable to survive. This leaves empty units which some of the chain brands considering it to be worth a "punt". I'd have thought that businesses operating in shops is a better alternative than a high street with multiple empty units, but what do I know, they are just thoughts on the subject.   Take a look at Croydon and Bromley where what were once thriving high streets are in decline.  I have to say that some of the prices charged by the independents are eye watering, and incomes i'd have thought have to be substantial to afford their prices. Personally I'd love a Lidl to open on what was the site of the Harvester, but I guess that would get shouted down, oh the thought of Lidl in Dulwich. Whatever next. 
    • IMO, Sealy, the best nights sleep you'll ever have.  
    • I don’t know what the shop was originally next to the big St Christopher’s but if Holland and Barrett are taking it over then surely it’s good to have a choice on Lordship Lane? The Camberwell H&B is always empty but the Brixton branch busy.  I remember when the Marks & Spencer food shop was Iceland? Now the M&S is a very busy store and at the time regenerated the high street!
    • Nor would I have done, but it came up when I googled John Lewis reviews. Do you not trust TrustPilot reviews? Even allowing for the fact that many people only post reviews when they have had poor service, 27% one star reviews is indicative of something wrong, I would say. That's 27% of 76,392 reviews. That's an awful lot of people who don't  think the service they got from John Lewis was even worth two stars, let alone more. Screenshot attached.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...