Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> An interjection eh? Hmmmm...definitely one for

> the Drawing Room...had to look that one up...

>

>

> Definition of interjection on the Web:

>

> ejaculation

>

>

>

> My mistake old bean.


To be fair I think LM may have been confused by the syntax/grammar employed by Brendan. Had he said "what up with that, man" [note my insertion of the comma] his meaning may have been clearer, no?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10185-friday/#findComment-301321
Share on other sites

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Balls, cock and nonsense!

>

> I was being perfectly clear.



Well there's no need to get all baity about it old thing. Whilst I don't wish to pick a fight with the [allegedly] scrummiest male forumite, I am obliged to point out that had you been "perfectly clear" LM would have not got confused in the first place, but she did, so you weren't.


Quad Erat Demonstrandum.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10185-friday/#findComment-301325
Share on other sites

legalbeagle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> To be fair I think LM may have been confused by

> the syntax/grammar employed by Brendan. Had he

> said "what up with that, man" his meaning may

> have been clearer, no?


*raises flute of organic prosecco to legalbeagle*


thanks for that legalbeagle...that was exactly how I read it...



*shrugs shoulders and has another slurp of the rather moreish beverage*

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10185-friday/#findComment-301330
Share on other sites

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It was typed as clear as day. I in no way stated

> that commas would or would not be used.

> Misinterpretation is therefore the liability of the reader.



Ambiguity is most strongly construed against the party using it: Ambiguitas contra stipulatorem est.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10185-friday/#findComment-301335
Share on other sites

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It was typed as clear as day. I in no way stated

> that commas would or would not be used.

> Misinterpretation is therefore the liability of

> the reader.

>

> Caveat emptor.


Rightie ho. If you say so dear.


[rolls eyes and toddles off to join LM for a glass of bubbly]

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10185-friday/#findComment-301336
Share on other sites

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> karter Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Yes it's Friday. This means that on Saturday

> > morning the streets of ED will be full of

> sh!te,

> > blood and vomit, once again.

>

> Yes, sorry about that karter...I'll try and

> restrict my alcohol intake tonight...


Thanxs LM, and please no not be going on my doorstep, you know it aint right.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10185-friday/#findComment-301340
Share on other sites

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Does that mean I win?

>

> Rock on!

>

> Rock on indeed.



Yes dear. Of course it does. It has been shown to all that despite someone saying you confused them, you did not cause any confusion. Well done you!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10185-friday/#findComment-301342
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Time will tell if H&B are loved or loathed, the footfall they get and generate will determine if they stay or go. That's the nature of businesses, they come and go dependant on usage. Examples are M&S, Poundland Local, Co-op, Superdrug, Mons, the chain restaurant/takeaways, the chain Estate Agents, Toolstation, Screwfix to name a few.  As much as people would like to see Lordship Lane remain a high street of independents, it is becoming clear that due to Landlords hiking rents, some are unable to survive. This leaves empty units which some of the chain brands considering it to be worth a "punt". I'd have thought that businesses operating in shops is a better alternative than a high street with multiple empty units, but what do I know, they are just thoughts on the subject.   Take a look at Croydon and Bromley where what were once thriving high streets are in decline.  I have to say that some of the prices charged by the independents are eye watering, and incomes i'd have thought have to be substantial to afford their prices. Personally I'd love a Lidl to open on what was the site of the Harvester, but I guess that would get shouted down, oh the thought of Lidl in Dulwich. Whatever next. 
    • IMO, Sealy, the best nights sleep you'll ever have.  
    • I don’t know what the shop was originally next to the big St Christopher’s but if Holland and Barrett are taking it over then surely it’s good to have a choice on Lordship Lane? The Camberwell H&B is always empty but the Brixton branch busy.  I remember when the Marks & Spencer food shop was Iceland? Now the M&S is a very busy store and at the time regenerated the high street!
    • Nor would I have done, but it came up when I googled John Lewis reviews. Do you not trust TrustPilot reviews? Even allowing for the fact that many people only post reviews when they have had poor service, 27% one star reviews is indicative of something wrong, I would say. That's 27% of 76,392 reviews. That's an awful lot of people who don't  think the service they got from John Lewis was even worth two stars, let alone more. Screenshot attached.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...