Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think you?re right Loz, they?ll have to pay up.


Thicke (the one with the horrible eyes that the record company makes him hide behind sunglasses) nicked the feel and groove from a classic track and added some unpleasant lightly rapey lyrics, making for a giant smash-n-grab hit that was instantly (and best) forgotten.


The Zep took a commonplace chord sequence and expanded it into an iconic 8-minute prog opus in three movements which will be played, basically forever.


Of the two, I feel more sorry for Zep. But it's still going to cost them, not that they're short of dough.

AFAIK The dude who wrote the 'original' had piped-up about it sounding a bit you know, inspired by, (especially since Zep supported them on tour!) but didn't feel sufficiently slighted to take it to court. He probably took the reasonable position that while they nicked the four chords, they'd gone on to make it their own - and then some.


Unfortunately he's dead now - and his estate (and publishing) is now in the hands of someone who SMELLS MONEY AND LOTS OF IT

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thicke ... nicked the feel and groove from a classic track


Well actually as I understand it, Pharrell Williams did... Thicke just turned up later that night, off his head on coke, and ad-libbed some creepy stuff into the mic.


I think if LZ can point to several other works in rock/folk/etc with the same chord pattern then maybe they'll be OK, but it's not looking good.

I blame Thicke entirely.. because he has horrible eyes.


I don't think Zep have got much chance of getting away without paying-up. Jimmy Page has already made it worse by saying he never heard the Taurus track until a few years ago, but they were on tour supporting Taurus around the time they released their original four-chord-patterned thing.


Same instrument, same pattern, the timeframe fits, they were in the right place, professor Plum with the candlestick in the library..

Spot on. *Bob*. This isn't new by the way. The lawsuit or whatever you call it has been happening for at least a couple of years. Zep ripped off a lot of blues artists too and never gave them credit at the time unlike the Stones who always championed blues artists and gave credit where it was due.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Here's another instance of the Zep "inspiration"

> thing.


> Which the Small Faces borrow heavily from.


> And then later Led Zeppelin come up with this and

> give themselves full credit.



Dixon got his piece of the pie on WLL in the end though - as well as full credit and remuneration on other Zep tracks.. they weren't exactly trying to hide from him.


The fact that the nobody bothered to haul the Faces through the courts tells the story: as long as you don't make too much money you're probably ok.


Secret Chord progressions and undiscovered melodies are thin on the ground these days. If all writers fairly credited everyone they 'borrowed from' - before even a deal was signed or a record released - they'd spend more time trying to agree the publishing then they would writing the music. IMO.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dixon* got his piece of the pie on WLL in the end

> though



* daughter of Willie Dixon, I mean. Same old story...


Anyway, once upon a time there was probably an old blues guy sitting in a bar playing his $10 guitar who can recall when Willie Dixon caught his set and then went on to borrow a few licks.

That Spirit thing resembles Pachabel's cannon in it's structure https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOA-2hl1Vbc.

It is a basic musical structure like an arpeggio so I think LZ will get let off (I hope so or the flood gates will open)

The funniest example of this is when Malcolm the genius in Season 6 episode 7 of Malcolm in the Middle tries his very hardest to compose a guitar song and it ends up like the Miaow Mix advertisement.

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It is a basic musical structure like an arpeggio

> so I think LZ will get let off (I hope so or the

> flood gates will open)


In this case, this is not a defence - and it won't wash.


The floodgates have been open on this for half a century, it's not new. Amongst the few high profile cases that make the news because the tracks are just so famous, there are countless others that are negotiated behind the scenes. The more money involved, the more horse-trading.


Uptown Funk is a classic example: starts out with a couple of writers and a couple of publishers. Becomes smash hit. Vultures circle. At one point this track had three dozen publishers making a claim! I think they've settled on ten writers now or something like that. Good going for a basic chord progression.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello. Would you like a sofa bed? We have one to give away…photos attached. The scatter cushions are not included.
    • Complaint submitted.  Your helpful link took me straight to the relevant page. 🙏
    • I spend a riddiculous amount of time at the PO.  Every day.  I watch and I watch closely.  Returns take seconds.  The wait might be long but the scan takes a second.  The only thing that slows down a return is people scrolling through their phones looking for QR codes. Business customers like me take seconds.  I might have up to 2 bags of boxes but every one is perfectly packaged and pre-paid.  It just needs a scan.  Seconds. For customers like me and for returns customers they could just put in a self-service check out and we would all be in and out in minutes.  Quicker than M&S.   Or, have a dedicated window for scanning and nothing else.  No facility to handle money at that window so nobody is tempted to ask for a service other than scanning.  That would get the queues down instantly. It is the people picking up things that backs up the queue.  The branch is not equipped to provide the service.  Next time you're in the branch take a look at the shelf space immediately behind the servers.  A few stacking shelves.  That's all the space they have.  Everything else is on the floor in a mess.  I take on board what someone said about the private delivery companies not delivering to Peckham and I didn't know that.   The biggest time wasting service of all is Parcelforce.  If someone in front of me asks for Parcelforce I want to cry.  Long, long, forms need to be filled out by hand, in triplicate.  It is Dickensian.   Please consider taking a few minutes to fill out an online complaint (link below).  I honestly believe that an influx of complaints might make a difference.  I don't want to demoralise the staff or anything sinister but the PO needs to see that the branch is broken. https://www.postoffice.co.uk/contact-us/in-branch-customer-experience    
    • Couldn't agree more with the frustration. I avoid it like the plague but made the mistake of picking up a parcel a couple of months ago and it took them 20 minutes to find it. This was after queuing for an hour. All the pickup parcels were just in a massive heap with no order or organisation so they manually had to search for everything. Bizarre and deeply annoying as if run well it could be a good asset to the Post Office and of course the community. Also, very much agree with the point re not taking it out on counter staff as it must be a terrible and demoralising environment to work in.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...