Jump to content

Recommended Posts

my daughter has just started reception at a school in Lewisham - Edmund Waller. They don't have a uniform and I find it really strange and a bit of a pain. Uniform makes the morning rush so much easier! You can buy a school sweatshirt - but that seems even more weird - either do a uniform or don't!

I never wore a uniform at school either (though obviously branded stuff was not allowed). Think that most schools now have one - or at least sweatshirts etc. - as uniform is generally seen as "a good thing".


I find it sad, it was nice having choice, though agree that no decisions about what to wear in the morning must be a plus!

  • 2 weeks later...

Friends in Germany, Austria and the Czech Republic who've visited me here have all expressed amazement at the sight of crowds of children all wearing the same clothes - especially infant school children " do you want them to grow up militarised" - well, maybe a uniform doesn't do that, but everytime some school proclaims that its new uniform has made all the difference to its results, I reflect that the UK is the only country in Europe (excpet I think Russia and Turkey) where uniforms are common. Are our results so much better?

My 2 boys went to Ivydale when it didn't have a compulsory uniform (I'm not sure if that is still the case), and to be honest, pretty much wore the same choice of comfortable clothes every day. It may be more difficult with girls.

As for uniforms having a democratising effect, my eldest had the first 4 years at St Mary Magdalene, (he's 16 so this is a while ago) we bought the comfortable sweatshirt/polo shirt choice though it was not cheap, and those who couldn't afford it had to make their children wear cheap white Primark shirts and ties. TIES FOR INFANT SCHOOL CHILDREN! what is wrong with this country?

Uniforms are great aren't they ?

I wonder why we don't all wear uniforms as adults ?

Employers could specify colours and style for employees and the state could issue regulations for all those unwaged.

How sad - apart from jobs where it seems to be important that the public can identify employees -in this country the wearing of uniform ( and all its many advantages )seems to be lost when people become 16 or ,increasingly ,18.

You're right, lorraineliyanage, I don't really have a problem with Primark, my boys and I have plenty of clothes from there. I just felt it was unfortunate that the children whose families could afford it could have the comfortable option, whereas the others had to wear buttoned up shirts with collars.

Most schools have uniform nowadays even if it is just a sweat shirt, and some offer nearly new clothing via PTA or School Secretary. Helping out at school fairs/sales over the years - most parents donated good quality uniform - it was just too small for their children. We rarely had any left to bag up as prudent parents were happy to pay 50p for a sweat shirt etc to last a couple of terms.

My grandchildren wear 2nd hand clothes and accept this as part of the family finances, of course they also have new clothes to balance this out. My other grandchildren in Essex, have never had 2nd hand clothing - not even passed down from brother to brother, and this has cost their parents hundreds of pounds. Interestingly it was not until baby number 4 that our daughter surprised us all by accepting 2nd hand baby clothes from her friends on the grounds that with young children is was false economy to buy every thing new for a young and growing child!!


Uniform can often be the less expensive option.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
    • This link mau already have been posted but if not olease aign & share this petition - https://www.change.org/p/stop-the-closure-of-east-dulwich-post-office
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...