Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was alerted to this item on the Private Eye website this morning.


Ordinarily I couldn't be all that fussed, but zoning in on East Dulwich provoked my curiosity - how comes The Gardens is really the only place locally which is "acquired by overseas companies"? I'd have thought that, particularly given its age, it would have been privately held by a large number of individuals, not a single organisation.


Except that, that it exactly what it appears. Who are "Grip Nomco 3" and "Grip Nomco 4" from Jersey?


file.php?5,file=214092

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/100959-who-owns-the-gardens/
Share on other sites

Who are "Grip Nomco 3" and "Grip Nomco 4" from Jersey?


These are anonymous companies (obviously linked by the names) which will have probably hidden beneficial owners. The ?1 fee paid will be a token transfer cost moving ownership off-shore (from on-shore). This suggests that the whole square (freehold) is owned by one entity, but that is typical of many London squares - in central London owned by such as the Duke of Westminster. An individual buys up a plot of land, develops it (in London often as a square) and lets the housing on it on long leases. Often the freeholds are later sold individually, in this case obviously not. At some stage a tax adviser will have suggested that it would be better to hold the property off shore - possibly for IHT reasons. The Freehold of course may have been sold to an off-shore holder recently. The fact that it's all together now I feel reflects not someone buying up the square piecemeal, but someone buying (or moving off-shore) an estate that was already together, probably since its very first development.

Oddly enough for a tax haven, the Jersey Financial Services Commission has a website that does actually publish shareholders of Jersey companies, for ?4 a time: https://www.jerseyfsc.org/


So far, I have traced

* GRIP NomCo 3 LIMITED is 100% owned by

* G:RES-CO4 LIMITED, which is 100% owned by

* Crestbridge Corporate Trustees Limited, which is 100% owned by

* Crestbridge Limited, which is 100% owned by

* Crestbridge Jersey Holdings Limited


Now that I've spent ?16 so far, perhaps someone else would like to pick up the baton? I suspect it will roll up to these guys at some point and then the trail will go cold


http://www.crestbridge.com/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • They used to have dedicated park wardens, who I'm sure used to look after the parks and locked and opened the gates. Years ago I knew someone who was one. I thought they were based in that hut by the toilets. Are they not there any more? The community wardens are attached to the police rather than a specific park, aren't they?
    • Yes, sad how Rye Lane has taken a dive, interesting to see those pics CPR Dave. It's shocking how the section between Choumert Road and the Nag's Head in particular has lost its vibrancy, meanwhile the next section to the top of Peckham Rye Common has gentrified. Wonder why such a distinction in fortunes? Anyway the station square plans have fallen behind yet again, demolition won't now start this summer. The only "work" that will now take place this summer is surveying of the arcade, which they've had 10 years since planning permission to do. At least the replacement TSB branch has progressed but the Blenheim Grove corner building still looks unfinished, despite claims it "is now complete". https://www.southwark.gov.uk/planning-environment-and-building-control/current-and-future-development/peckham-and-nunhead-2
    • DKH was two form entry, it is now one form entry to cope with the fact it was far more under subscribed than other schools in the area. They had actually combined year groups into single classes, 3/4 and 5/6.  When a school changes name, it’s usually because of a bad reputation perhaps the results.  The new name is dry with no history unlike its current name. It’s a very sketchy decision. It’s an expensive vanity project for someone.  What  will happen if the name change does not increase applications to the school?     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...