Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The woman gets a lot of stick on this forum about not showing her face in the area, but I remember a particularly glorious day when she stood at the bottom of Bawdale Road with a banner as part of the (very tiny) East Dulwich Rubbish! campaign. She was helping to complain about the fly-tipping that used to exist at the bottom of the road ...
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1006-our-mp/#findComment-25734
Share on other sites

Interesting how sightings of Ms Jowell is around election time.


I went to see her about a politically sensitive matter - the shutting of a government funded organisation. This would (and did) result in the loss of the jobs of local people - but was as a result of a Cabinet decision.


A local MP would have put her constituents jobs first - she put the Government first and ran like a rabbit.


I have no political axe to grind, but I am not impressed by Ms Jowells priorties.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1006-our-mp/#findComment-25791
Share on other sites

In my family HH is known as "do you know who I am Harman" after her performance at a local hospital trying to visit out of visiting hours and pressing staff to let her to the bedside because of her "status".


We've all heard about Two Jags Prescott, Labour?s former Deputy Leader. Now Harriet Harman is not only Deputy Leader and Chairman of the Labour Party, she is Leader of the House of Commons and is still supposed to be MP for Camberwell and Peckham (which now extends to the Lewisham boundary and takes in elements of East Dulwich). Despite the fact that she has been the local MP for 25 years, ask almost anyone on the street and they?d be hard pressed to say who she was. It?s time for her to go to the Lords and let us elect someone who will focus on looking after Camberwell and Peckham. Heaven knows we still have big problems, of genuine concern to the people that live here. Crime, education, jobs, the health service, especially the impending closure of the Maudsley Emergency Clinic, all these things could do with some attention from a hardworking local MP

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1006-our-mp/#findComment-25807
Share on other sites

I disagree Keef. I really think MPs should where possible, live in their consituencies. I know this isn't possible with most as they have to spend so much time in London, taking part in Parliamentary debates, scrutinising legislation and raising constiuency issues with Government.... Anyway, I see no reason why London MPs can't, in Tessa's case Westminster a stones throw away.


It's just, well, bad form.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1006-our-mp/#findComment-25922
Share on other sites

But maybe she just doesn't want to live in ED..... I don't honestly see how it makes a difference, as long as she's doing a good job for the people that do live there....


Now I'm not saying she does or doesn't do a good job, I personally haven't had dealings. I'm just making the point that I don't think it matters if she's around or not.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1006-our-mp/#findComment-25924
Share on other sites

I have never been able to comprehend how, given that our MP was Minister in Charge of the Olympics, we are getting ZERO benefit from the Olympic activity.


All of the transport infrastructure is going elsewhere and I would give the East London Line phase 2 a cat-in-hells change of being delivered post 2012.


There was a punlic consultation about a tram link from Camden to Peckham - but that has gone quiet.


Whats the point in having an MP with power if she does bog all of fundamental benefit to the area? She may support this campaign or that that movement and wear a Dulwich Hamlet top when the cameras around, but we want to see better transport links, better schools and less crime.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1006-our-mp/#findComment-25965
Share on other sites

Fear 'n boozin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> wm.she wont have a car now she's not a Minister.

>

> Did anybody know Southwark has a mayor? Vickie

> Nash be her name. Never knew.


That's because you're a fool! ;-)


Note: for anyone who thinks that's harsh, you don't know what wm. stands for..... I was provoked!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1006-our-mp/#findComment-25969
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...