Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yes, the thing is, the council's proposal is not for a downsize; it's for a fee-paying gym with a few random bookshelves (and no library staff, just gym staff). That's not downsizing a library, that's closing it.


The council have come up with such an ill-thought-out plan (including excavating the basement of the listed building) that they are not ready to go ahead with it straight away, which means that proceeding with closing the library on the arbitrary date of 1st April involves them paying lots of money to a security firm to protect the buildings while they work out what to do next. Half of the libraries in the borough of Lambeth were closed up and padlocked on the same day. That's a hell of a downsize. The council is suggesting that everyone can just use Brixton Library, but as the author Stella Duffy points out, that's already overstretched. https://stelladuffy.wordpress.com/2016/04/04/when-is-a-library-not-a-library/


It's my understanding that library staff in Lambeth had come up with a proposal that could have kept all the libraries open by running them as a 'staff mutual', but the council rejected this.


But anyway - whatever one's views on libraries - the main point I was trying to raise was the disgraceful nature of the response from councillors, who reacted to concerned queries by posting sneers, smears and 'amusing' cat photos..!

The behaviour of some councillors has been childish and disgraceful. This is something to take up with their CLPs - especially given that they are paid around ?15k a year to serve - more if they hold cabinet or special positions. If they are going to make unpopular decisions, they should stand and defend those positions.
I also think that what is behind this is a money raising exercise. There can be no other explanation for replacing a public service with a commercial enterprise. There is no interest whatsoever from the council in the keeping libraries open. It's the same with the Cressingham and Central Hill proposals - no interest in community led alternative porposals over profitable sell offs to the highest bidder. A shelf of books within a gym is NOT a library, neighbourhood or otherwise, and Lambeth are taking people for fools if they think no-one sees past the stupid use of words to try and suggest otherwise.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I also think that what is behind this is a money raising exercise.


I think it's partially a money raising exercise, but it's also a not-spending-money exercise. It can't be cheap to keep libraries up and running.


The person in the blog referenced a couple of posts ago wrote, "I live a five minute walk along the same street from the Carnegie Library, which has just been closed by Lambeth Council ? as has the Minet Library, another ten minutes away.". Honestly - was two libraries with 10-15 minutes walk of each other a good use of funds in a time where there is not a lot of money to go around?


It might be the cynic in me, but I suspect this is far and away the most people Carnegie Library has had in it for a while. But it would be interesting to see stats on usage, to see exactly what the demand is. Most people, understandably, like the idea of libraries, but how many actually use them in the age of the internet? I have a library card, but have only used it twice in about four years.


But whatever people think of the plans, the councillors tweeting cat pictures and generally not engaging is pretty damn poor. I'd like to think people will remember come the next elections, but I bet most of them get re-elected as the people blindly think, "ooh, Labour - tick".

And libraries offer free internet and other services besides the loan of books. For the unemployed and poor with children, libraries are a valuable resource. How much do we put on the cost of every child having an equal stab at literacy for example, of which early access to books and language plays a huge part. Small local libraries tend to be used by the young and the old. And if you take a look at any of the large libraries offering things like study space, they are always oversubscribed. These things can not be measured in terms of financial profit. They are a public service central to both culture and learning.


Just on the point of there being two libraries within walking distance of each other, well Lambeth are closing both - so that's not really an argument is it. If one were being closed and the other kept open that would be different. Lambeth are doing to the Library system the same thing that has happened with other sectors, by trying to centralise the service into larger venues. But they are completely missing the point of libraries.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And libraries offer free internet and other services besides the loan of books. For the

> unemployed and poor with children, libraries are a valuable resource. How much do we put on the cost

> of every child having an equal stab at literacy for example, of which early access to books and

> language plays a huge part. Small local libraries tend to be used by the young and the old. And if

> you take a look at any of the large libraries offering things like study space, they are always

> oversubscribed. [...] They are a public service central to both culture and learning.


I'm not denying any of that. If the libraries are well used and reaching significant numbers of the people you describe, then closing them would be definitely worth fighting.


My question is this: how much are each of the Lambeth libraries being used? Does anyone know if there any metrics available?


> These things can not be measured in terms of financial profit.


I agree, but it can be measured in terms of value for money. If Lambeth are spending ?x on libraries, how many people is that money spend reaching? That's the big question.

The numbers using the library have doubled in recent times. I think that as it is getting more expensive to study, libraries will become increasingly important in closing the gap between the rich And the poor. As more people are being priced out of London, if the few that remain use the library and it improves their life chances, than in my opinion, it's money Well spent. It's unjustifiable to sacrifice our pubic services In light of the tax evasion/ avoidance that amounts to billions...

bodsier Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The numbers using the library have doubled in recent times.


Do you have a source for that, or did you just make that figure up? And if you do have a source, doubled from what? If it went from 10 to 20, that's terrible. If it went from 100,000 to 200,000, then that's amazing. Which is it?

minder Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why would bodsier make that figure up?


Well, as they say, 73.6% of all statistics are made up on the spot.


Besides, if bodsier didn't make it up, bodsier will be able to provide a reputable source for it, won't they?

A quick update with some upcoming events:

Come and support the efforts to keep the libraries open.


SOLIDARITY WITH THE JUNIOR DOCTORS STRIKE

8am Breakfast on the steps. Supporters! come and collect our special banner at 8am for


breakfast and then head down to support the Junior Doctors Strike at Kings.

7pm Candlelit vigil


Thursday 7th April 4pm Poet Jemima Foxtrot

4.30 Sian Berry Green Party Mayoral candidate visits


7pm Candlelit vigil


Friday 8th April 7pm Candlelit vigil



Saturday 9th April March for Lambeth Libraries Assemble Carnegie Library 11.30am

7pm Candlelit vigil

A lovely building


There is a liklihood that the similarly lovely Forest Hill Library will be run by volunteers. Lewisham apparently aint so good on running libraries ie serving the community rather than small sectors of the community, whereas Southwark are. Of course we are talking Lambeth on this occasion.


For balance Lewisham score much better on public health services that some other LAs

Just to address the people questioning the popularity and usage of Carnegie library, I was a regular user and have been for many years. They have a regular adult improver reading group, chess club, gallery, yoga groups and many other events that the librarians have worked so hard to plan and run for all the community. Also the baby/toddler story and singalong on Fridays which some days had 60 kids plus parents making it difficult to even get in.


The last 3 years at the hands of these dedicated librarians had meant that in terms of borrower numbers and users, this is actually one of the most used libraries in the borough.


So yes, the library is very, very busy.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Errr could it be because of the noise pollution coming from it perhaps? You may not be able to hear it where you live but anyone on the Dulwich Village side of Lordship Lane all the way to beyond Brockwell Park is being disturbed by it - the sound wash from it is huge and that's a lot of people. As I said before we know people who live nearer to Brockwell Park to us and they say it is unbearable.   To be fair the Emirates moved to a piece of wasteland between railway tracks so it actually in a less densely populated area now and the council actually goes out of their way to try to mitigate the impact on local residents and yes, other than the concerts, you could hear a pin drop on matchdays! 😉 
    • Chains moving in is a sure sign that LL is heading for a fall. They are parasites, waiting for the independents to be successful and then, in partnership with rapacious landlords, they move in and force out those very businesses who have created the market they then seek to exploit. They replace a lively diversity with a bland and predictable offering. Then, when a downturn arrives, they move out, leaving boarded up premises and charity shops. Independent businesses who have worked hard to make a success of their efforts will try to see out hard times as they’ve invested so much. Chains look only at the bottom line and think nothing of closing branches. Chains are liable also to expand too fast, be managed badly and then collapse. Think of Brick House being forced out by Gail’s, the closure of White Stuff (although that chain was replaced by another) and JoJo Maman Bebe. . Sadly, I fear that will be the future of LL. 
    • It’s the impact the festival has on the community, the people living next door to the park who have to endure the thumping music and worse. Then there’s the park and the state it’s left in and the wildlife, especially nesting birds. All the roads going down Denmark Hill towards the park were closed off and roads off half moon lane and going up towards West Norwood closed off with wardens at each end, who were paid by Lambeth Council to stand there for the 4 days.  The festival made the news channels and interviews suggested most of the people attending weren’t fron the local area but places like Ireland and Scotland.  I live a 20 minute walk from the park and could hear the thumping music all day and night. Also the wind certainly carried the smell of drugs to my garden! For 4 days I couldn’t believe how strong it was. 
    • Emirates Stadium is  >60,00 but they tend to be very quiet 🙂 Jokes aside though, it's a case in point. Highbury was <40,000 and was 300M up the road, so there are definitely Islington residents who used to live half a mile from a fairly big football stadium, and now live right by a massive one. One that holds rock/pop concerts too accomodating 70,000 fans whether they like ot or not.   40% of Islington households are in social housing so regardless of when they moved their current homes, they may have had little say in exactly where they are housed.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...