Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So I've heard from various friends in the area that property prices are dropping in east Dulwich and Honor oak, & hanging around a while.


My boss only sold her place after 9 weeks and a reduction (HOP) and my friend has just dropped the price of her 2 bed flat, way under what the agents originally thought they could get for it (ED).



Any thoughts? We were thinking of selling this spring BUT maybe not now...

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/100287-property-prices-cooling-in-ed/
Share on other sites

Probably more likely is that some hideously over priced properties are hanging around. There's a ground floor flat on my road up to c?650k just because there is a recording studio in the garden. The flat itself is in fair order but unlikely to go for that price, unless they find a buyer who specifically wants a recording studio in the garden!


Compare that with a 3 bed house that sold recently after the owner passed away, that went for c?850k which was an absolute bargain. It needed updating internally but you could move straight in.


I suspect that the properties that are sitting around are those where the Agent is royally extracting the yellow stuff when pricing it up as the market has been so buoyant for so long.

I don't disagree with any of the above comments, but also worth noting that prices generally cool off post-Christmas. If properties still aren't shifting over the coming Spring months, then it's likely to be a longer term trend rather than a seasonal blip. Either way, if you're selling and buying in the same market it shouldn't make any difference...

Have to agree that it seems a lot of people are falling for the classic highest value estate agent trick.


If you were thinking of selling then sell if you don't want to sell then don't it's as simple as that unless the cash from place you are thinking of selling won't be used to buy another property.... Your house/flat is not the only one going up and down in price. It's too easy to get tied up in the I'll wait until it's worth X but ultimately all that will happen is you may either miss buying your dream home or a currently very cheap mortgage rate.

Agree about the overpriced stock comments though. There's a 2 bed place in Darrell Road I looked, and dismissed as grossly overpriced at ?600K, a couple of years ago. It's just gone back on the market (presumably the same owners as the decor hasn't changed) for just shy of ?650K.
Also to add to my comment above to make sure I don't sound high and mighty, I fell for the high valuation trick from an estate agent who I won't name, ultimately I wasted 7 months, had the hassle of tidying the house every weekend and trying to keep out of my own flat for that period etc... Took it off the market for a few months and put it back on at let's say a more aggressive / realistic price and it sold for asking price within 2 weeks...

Dbboy - agents would say that though! The reality is its not always as hot and lucrative as they make our. Buyers still have power to dictate prices by refusing to be pushed around and sticking to budgets.


Thanks Calsug - we will probably still do it before certain small tots get any bigger. Love love love East Dulwich and really want to stay. There is no neighbourhood like it.

Agree it's tough to move away from ED we were there for 4 years but ultimately couldn't afford the SE22 postcode anymore. We moved to SE15 which is still a short(ish) walk over Peckham Rye park to East Dulwich when we want to plus honor oak park station is better connected for us.
What Clasug said. For 100K+ less you can often get very similar types of houses (with the benefit of upstairs bathrooms rather than off the kitchen) with more square metres of floorspace and bigger gardens, with better connections in Honor Oak. Yes, it's a bit yummy-mummysville and more suburban feeling than ED, but not sure the difference in culture is worth 100K!

Not sure I agree with red devil and calsug that if you are buying and selling, the state of the market doesn't make any difference.


If you are looking to sell and then purchase a higher value property you'd be best off doing so in a depressed market where values have dropped. based on following logic:


if the market has dropped by 10%, that 10% equates to more in real terms on the more expensive property you are buying than the less expensive one you are selling, as follows -


the property you are selling was worth 500000, but is now worth 450000. ie its lost 50K value

the property you want to buy was worth 1000000, but is now worth 900000. ie its lost 100K value.


ie, in real terms the more expensive property has lost more value and you stand to 'gain' 50K.


However, of course this is a principle based on an even market where rises and falls apply equally to all properties, and does not take into account local/individual factors that may influence prices. I'm not saying this is an easy game to play (and other factors may dictate that you are unable to wait until the market is right), but it is a general principle to bear in mind and shows that understanding whether the market is rising or falling is relevant in a decision to buy and sell.

XIX yes I see the logic in that but really both our logics are flawed, period family homes for example will rise and fall at a different percentage to a first time buyers flat. The general gist of my argument is if the timing and affordability is right for you don't wait to see if you can gain more on you current home.
A property is only worth what a buyer is willing to pay. The vendor can either accept the offer, go through a period of negotiation or wait for a higher offer. I suppose it comes down to how much the buyer wants the property and long the vendor is willing to wait for a buyer at the price they want to sell at.

ED - NAGAIUTB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> a 3 bed house that sold recently, that went for c?850k which was an absolute bargain.




I know you're probably right compared to similar properties in the area, but I still find it unbelievable that houses in East Dulwich go for that kind of money, let alone it being seen as a bargain!

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I still find it unbelievable that houses in East Dulwich go for

> that kind of money, let alone it being seen as a

> bargain!


I know.. 15 years ago a house was probably worth 250K or so.


Not sure how much of it is down to ED becoming yuppified (as my Mum said) and how much is down to London property in general going crazy... a bit of both obviously...

It is a bit both.


London as a whole is cooling. Its only just started but I have friends that are looking who have seen a dramatic shift in the last few weeks. Its the knock on effect of the distress in the super prime segment. Last year prices in Knightsbridge fell 7%. The new high end developments both in prime central London and on the South Bank are flooding the market just as demand from buy to let investors (both abroad and domestic is cooling).


I actually think this year will be a tough slow market with very few transactions and falling prices. Long term I think prices will continue to rise unless something dramatic happens regarding jobs growth in the city (possible depending on Brexit / immigration policy).

That's true-- . Where my friend is looking-- Penge / Eltham, Catford-- was equally manic (sealed bids etc) until recent weeks. ED has been less manic than that for a good long while. I think the slowdown will disproportionately impact the higher segments of the market.


The highest end of the market is virtually frozen. The buyers are no longer there at same price as before. My boss lives in Chelsea and his house has been on the market for 4 months. That market is so over-valued and buyers simply aren't there at those prices anymore.

LondonMix Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The new high end developments both in prime central London and on

> the South Bank are flooding the market just as demand from buy to let investors (both abroad and

> domestic is cooling).


This is exactly why people who complain about high-end stuff being built are wrong. Just build, build and build and prices in London will normalise. The problem is simple - more people than properties.

ed_pete Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is Louisa your Mum then Jeremy ?


Haha... I reckon my mum's slightly older, but they're both of an age where to them, a young city dweller with a good job = "yuppy"!


But my mum doesn't think pizza is fancy.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is exactly why people who complain about

> high-end stuff being built are wrong. Just build,

> build and build and prices in London will

> normalise. The problem is simple - more people

> than properties.



Indeed. But then when plans are submitted to build, everyone suddenly gets all NIMBY and starts objecting. Look at the proposals for the Iceland building being 4 stories. Suddenly we've had people on this forum saying it will set a precedent and the area will be full of "high rises" (4 stories?!?!?).


I read this the other day, which I thought was interesting.


http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/davehillblog/2016/mar/29/which-london-mayor-candidate-will-fix-the-capitals-housing-crisis

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
    • Another recommendation for Silvano. I echo everything the above post states. I passed first time this week with 3 minors despite not starting to learn until my mid-30s. Given the costs for lessons I have heard, he's also excellent value.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...