Roll Deep

[Mick Mac]

May have been discussed already but has he gone again ?

Until next time....

[????]

Pay attention at the back..

..there's been at least one reincarnation since then in a russian baddie with dangerous shoes

[mockney piers]

Funny just talking about this.

If one person so much as dares to say 'oooh but why, he was funny' I swear .........

* looks down at second hand, taps foot *

[Mick Mac]

i did say has it had been discussed before. Dont spend all day looking at the forum you know. Not so much anyway.

[Narnia]

How many personas is one allowed on here? Are any of you real or just something engineered to entertain or annoy me? Am I real? Is there anything around the next corner before I reach it? Is this ED's answer to Star Treks holodeck? Should that be hollow?

[Mick Mac]

it only exists in your mind declan.

[iaineasy]

I thought he may have been back as Chrystal Clear, the only forumite to have truly riled me to anger. there will be more no doubt.

[Narnia]

  Quote

Eh...what does?

[mockney piers]

Ian, CC is actually lovely. I can vouch for the fella. He just got a bit upset at the thouht that a genuine local institution was being cynically killed off.

[iaineasy]

A bit? Calling people child molester was a little too far IMOH but hey life's too short to get pissed off about that for more than 5 minutes.

[mockney piers]

Honestly; he was just trying to do a pun. It came out wrong.

Don't worry, if you ever want someone to be there for you, someone you trust and love it's probably not him (but when push comes to shove I reckon it is), but you know, I fucking love him like a brother anyway.

Put it this way...I vouch for him, whatever that's worth.

[HAL9000]

I'm not trying to make an issue out of this, but when I have pointed out that you were quick to defend personal friends who crapped all over the forum you got quite indignant about it.

In situations like this I think it would be better (given your position) to keep quiet and encourage your friends to apologise on their own behalf and behave themselves in future.

[mockney piers]

Is that your thousandth post? Nice one, congratulations... Always good to see good people meet landmarks.

[RosieH]

Sorry to disagree with you HAL, but I don't think just because someone's a moderator it should mean that they don't get to have an opinion.

It's human nature to defend someone you like whom you feel has been misunderstood, and god knows, there have been rampant examples of people leaping to their friends' defence over perceived slights recently, so I think Mockney is more than entitled to voice his feelings on the matter.

[Ann]

Excuse me , does that mean people with the most posts opinions count more than others?

I don't give a damn about Roll Deep or any other who has been banned( has he?). As a public forum, can we all not respect our posts? Genuine that is.

[HAL9000]

So it was - and it only took me a year, a month and a day to achieve that landmark.

[Ann]

So Mockney Piers is a moderator? Ate the rest of us allowed to know?

[Mick Mac]

shhh. Its a secret.

[Ladymuck]

Mockney, I'm curious...please...how can you tell (other than by using the search facility - which would seem a bit odd in this instance) how many posts a user has made? Am I missing a trick?

HAL9000 congratulations to you.

[Narnia]

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ian, CC is actually lovely. I can vouch for the

> fella. He just got a bit upset at the thouht that

> a genuine local institution was being cynically

> killed off.

If you are talking about the quiz night thread last week-end it appeared that the 'character' in question was exceedingly pi**ed and used a lot of abusive language and suggested other things that some found offensive.If you read the thread which was removed overnight you wouldn't describe it a someone being a 'bit upset' but extremely upset to say the least.

[HAL9000]

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't think just because someone's a moderator it should

> mean that they don't get to have an opinion.

I'm merely making the point that as a general principle, those who stand in judgement should remain impartial.

Anyone can state an opinion, but we have gone beyond that: this judge is acting as counsel for the defence - as it happens, on a thread about some else who was subject to judgment and found guilty because, presumably, he didn't have friends in high places.

[Narnia]

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mockney, I'm curious...please...how can you tell

> (other than by using the search facility - which

> would seem a bit odd in this instance) how many

> posts a user has made? Am I missing a trick?

>

> HAL9000 congratulations to you.

Just click on the name of the poster LM.

[????]

Lady Muck "2025"

[Moos]

Hal "found guilty presumably because he didn't have friends in high places" - care to provide any evidence for that assumption?

[Ladymuck]

Declan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just click on the name of the poster LM.

I thank you Declan...and I don't wish to appear ungrateful...but that I am aware of. I was wondering if there was another facility or way of telling. It's just that I am mystified as to why someone would wish to click onto a user's name in this situation. Seems odd to me.