Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Honestly; he was just trying to do a pun. It came out wrong.

Don't worry, if you ever want someone to be there for you, someone you trust and love it's probably not him (but when push comes to shove I reckon it is), but you know, I fucking love him like a brother anyway.


Put it this way...I vouch for him, whatever that's worth.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10025-roll-deep/#findComment-297344
Share on other sites

I'm not trying to make an issue out of this, but when I have pointed out that you were quick to defend personal friends who crapped all over the forum you got quite indignant about it.


In situations like this I think it would be better (given your position) to keep quiet and encourage your friends to apologise on their own behalf and behave themselves in future.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10025-roll-deep/#findComment-297357
Share on other sites

Sorry to disagree with you HAL, but I don't think just because someone's a moderator it should mean that they don't get to have an opinion.


It's human nature to defend someone you like whom you feel has been misunderstood, and god knows, there have been rampant examples of people leaping to their friends' defence over perceived slights recently, so I think Mockney is more than entitled to voice his feelings on the matter.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10025-roll-deep/#findComment-297362
Share on other sites

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ian, CC is actually lovely. I can vouch for the

> fella. He just got a bit upset at the thouht that

> a genuine local institution was being cynically

> killed off.


If you are talking about the quiz night thread last week-end it appeared that the 'character' in question was exceedingly pi**ed and used a lot of abusive language and suggested other things that some found offensive.If you read the thread which was removed overnight you wouldn't describe it a someone being a 'bit upset' but extremely upset to say the least.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10025-roll-deep/#findComment-297373
Share on other sites

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't think just because someone's a moderator it should

> mean that they don't get to have an opinion.


I'm merely making the point that as a general principle, those who stand in judgement should remain impartial.


Anyone can state an opinion, but we have gone beyond that: this judge is acting as counsel for the defence - as it happens, on a thread about some else who was subject to judgment and found guilty because, presumably, he didn't have friends in high places.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10025-roll-deep/#findComment-297375
Share on other sites

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mockney, I'm curious...please...how can you tell

> (other than by using the search facility - which

> would seem a bit odd in this instance) how many

> posts a user has made? Am I missing a trick?

>

> HAL9000 congratulations to you.


Just click on the name of the poster LM.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10025-roll-deep/#findComment-297377
Share on other sites

Declan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Just click on the name of the poster LM.


I thank you Declan...and I don't wish to appear ungrateful...but that I am aware of. I was wondering if there was another facility or way of telling. It's just that I am mystified as to why someone would wish to click onto a user's name in this situation. Seems odd to me.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10025-roll-deep/#findComment-297385
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I would question ‘affordable’. Fit For is £115 per month for the standard (cheapest) membership.    for comparison, the leisure centre on CPRoad is £44 per month (£37 for concessions) and JAGs sports club is £60 per month, they also have various concession or family membership offers 
    • What a ridiculous plan. If this is to stop traffic "cutting through" where do they think it is now going to "cut through" via? Has the council produced any data on the scale of the problem on Ryedale - anything to back up their hypothesis? You cannot do these things in isolation as all it does is displaces traffic elsewhere. Dunstans is going to become awful - I feel for the residents there. Councils should not be allowed to implement these experimental TMOs, they are clearly using them to circumvent proper planning and engagement. Has anyone contacted the local councillors about this? The laughable thing was the local ward councillors were concerned about displacement from the wider Dulwich LTNs on their ward so is this an indirect acknowledgement that they are being impacted?  Ridiculous.  
    • I would never leave my dog tied up outside a shop nowadays. A large proportion of ‘dogs stolen’ notices feature dogs nicked from outside shops- fancy dogs, old dogs, mongrels , all sorts. Stolen on a whim, for mischief, for profit or as a bait dog to train fighters. A thief might abandon them shortly afterwards, but the heartbreak and confusion is already done and a reunion not guaranteed.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...