Huguenot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I can see your perspective Gallinello, but it's a > little bit self-obsessed to think that Thatcher's > single dirving force was the wholesale slaughter > of 'the working classes' How is my perspective "self-obsessed" and where do I say wholesale slaughter? > Picking up a few of your words: > "destruction, smash, slash, attack, civil war, > hungry, skinhead, murderous, onslaught, ruthless, > assault" all meted out on the working class by > "the nouveau riche, the petty bourgeois upstarts > and the yuppies, the city slickers and the wide > boys" > It's easy to extract words, then link them together, out of context (for example I mention "skinhead" in reference to Tebbits's nickname); I also mention "the nouveau riche, the petty bourgeois upstarts and the yuppies, the city slickers and the wide boys" as elements comprising Thatcher's power base, not in the context of them meting out an attack on the proletariat. You criticise Thatcher for 'no such thing as > society', whilst recommending wholesale class > retribution. Hypocrite is too small a word for > it. Where do I recommend "wholesale class retribution" and is hypocrite too small a word for me, or is hypocrisy too small a word for it? > Whilst you make many points that have value, the > merit is lost in the spittle, bluster and > contradictions. Which contradictions? And "spittle and bluster"!? Rich words indeed coming from an individual who paints a hyperbolic picture of a dystopic '70s Britain in tones of: "society was being held to ransom by a phalanx of extremist unelected tyrants controlling a mob without conscience; the despotism of under educated violent thugs in the hinterlands;Had the unions had their way, the UK would now resemble the polluted industrial wastelands and blighted lives of Eastern Europe."