CPR Dave

Cyclists seem to be very, very selfish round here.

I don't think any of the people that petition is addressed to are in a position to do anything about it. Helen Hayes tried before and things have got worse not better.

They aren't kingmaker but they can help co-ordinate a tactical vote to drain the swamp. If you're worried about where their supporters come from, you can check on their own map:https://www.onedulwich.uk/supporters There are more than enough supporters there to swing the vote one way or another.

I want to see the Lib Dems get out of the blocks early with some sensible policies that all residents buy in to. They are beating Labour and the Tories elsewhere and are much better resourced than an independent would be to win and to bring back community interaction into council policy.

I think it's too late to stop the LTNs. At least when James was councillor he would assess the merits of scheme fairly and gauge public opinion too. Remember - he actually blocked the closure of Melbourne Grove South when he was councillor because he could see it was counter-productive, would cause more pollution than it would save and it was not in the interest of the community. He did that in spite of seemingly being in favour of the scheme, and agreeing to commission a report at the request off the Melbourne Grove Traffic Action Group into the benefits of closing the road. Those are the sort of difficult decisions that a good councillor has to get the balance right on and James Barber did because he was actually intelligent enough to look at all sides of the issues.

Heh, imagine turning up at the Ivy House expecting it to be an Ivy franchise.

i did. I won't be fooled again.

Hello James Would you consider standing again in this year's elections? This thread is a great reminder of all the good work you did for our community.

So the LTNs are here to stay forever. Great. We can still kick out the shower that brought them in, though. Do we need to vote Lib Dem to do that? Would be amazing if some co-ordinated tactical voting happened to teach councillors a lesson about listening to voters.

You've wasted a huge amount of your time not answering the question you quoted there pal.

Agree jazzer. I could see them using a new bus stop as an excuse to drop those because TFL doesn't have enough money to pay for them any more. It's a race to the bottom on public transport in London at the moment. Shameful.

So for the thousands of people who objected to the LTNs in East Dulwich and were ignored by Southwark and dismissed by the East Dulwich Councillors, what option is there at the next election? Will One Dulwich stand on a promise of removing the LTNs and starting again with a scheme that works? I would vote for them if they did.

Have they kept the electronic bus information displays?

You can't get much more personal and vindictive than that message that was on Goose Green councillor James McAsh's jumper, and yet he claims that he only supports the LTNs in East Dulwich because they benefit everyone. Don't you think it is a valid part of the discussion on LTNs and that it is on topic to discuss whether goose green councillors are really thinking about the impact of their actions on all of the residents of Goose Green?

There is no point deleting it now. It's save elsewhere like this thread. No doubt others also have screenshots. It's such a stupid thing to do.

Page 1 of this thread "Regardless of whom you support politically, or whether you vote at all, we three Labour Councillors for Goose Green are keen to do whatever we can to help." That hasn't aged well has it. https://twitter.com/mcash/status/1474732079938158600?t=FOR6wsnJTMOsIBiLoc4dKQ&s=19 What a shame you reveal yourself like this.

What kind of welcome should those residents of Goose Green who are Tories expect from you at this so-called "community" meeting James?

He must really be quite stupid if he thinks that is an appropriate image to put out on twitter.

There is one at the junction of Peckham High St and Peckham Hill St

Moght be worth looking into whether the slaters now have squatters rights

Pollution has gone down in the central section of east dulwich grove though Pete, so it doesn't matter that it has gone up so much in your table.

And will they leave the strips in for January 2022 so that they can compare apples with apples? Doubt it, but let's see.

Is the undoctored January 2019 data actually available? I guess if they had just used that data instead there would be no reductions in traffic anywhere in EDG?

This thread is just getting started now that the councillors are here to tell the truth...

Who knows, but even our local councillor is now saying it's ok for EDG to carry more traffic because Melbourne Grove has less traffic. Heartblock was right all along.