jazzer

Service restored late this afternoon, I had quoted directly from TfL

FOREST HILL ROAD, SE22: Route 63 is starting and terminating at 'Peckhan Rye/East Dulwich Road (WN/WK)' due to a mechanical vehicle. Buses will not be serving remaining stops from/to Therapia Road. The road is clear, the turn around point at junc with Woodvale is clear, so no reason for the route to be curtailing at Peckham Rye. The 363 CONTINUES TO run along Peckham Rye, up Forest Hill Road and on route as per usual direction of travel both ways to Crystal Palace.

Signage has been put on roadways to inform "joe public" that major gas works are to commence ,6/5/2025, on Peckham Rye, Rye Lane AND East Dulwich Road.

I'd have zero tolerance on cyclists and send their and Lime bikes to the crusher!!!!!!

Mal - shame you don't like my comment. Bringing the mood down, what planet are you on. I was stating facts, and those can't be disputed, even by you.

believe it when it happens as their is so much work to be done to achieve what will be a beautiful square and in keeping with what the station probably originally looked like.

Oh no it's not

Not only does Sydenham Hill qualify for the least used if ever cycle lane, they're now installing one along Crystal Palace Parade. Who are the imbeciles who grant this to happen. Do they have any common sense or let alone any grasp of reality. It was utter chaos there this morning. Heaven help us, the lunatics really have taken over the asylum.

cause installing cycle lanes narrows roads and slows traffic flow, the road is only so wide, so any widening of pavements into the road causes both chaos and long term congestion as a result.

Try Evergreen, out Orpington direction from memory, good quality stock and about half the price of the likes of what was homebase & B&Q

Not meaning to cause any controversy, but are COVID jabs still necessary for over 60's and for how long (years) are they needed?

Last year Krystals were not using Pfizer, if you wanted it that had to be paid for, think it was £100. they should have given you some documentation saying which brand it was.

But not to the extent it is now, I remember when traffic used to flow and I mean flow.

No it will not do what you think it will. The consequence of roadworks this afternoon resulted in traffic being backed up in the direction to the Grove Tavern at about 5pm and it was solid and not moving, More traffic not moving so more stagnant pollution. No wonder more people are dying of cancer from the excessive pollution. If traffic moved it would help, but planners who deem "they know best" plus Mayor Khan think slowing traffic to a stagnant crawl is the answer, when common sense shows how wrong they are. The perfect example is Forest Hill Road, till the so called know it all planners decided it needed three lots of traffic signals installed. Where previously traffic used to flow, now it does the exact opposite. All these supposed new measures may keep people employed in traffic departments, the reality is it causes inconvenience and dramatically slows traffic down, which is wrong in every sense.

Yep, BUT slower journey's INCLUDES slower bus journeys if traffic moves slower, then everything in that traffic queue will move slower and take longer, your point does not hold tight It's not debating, its putting a counter argument that is then swiftly dismissed.

Yesterday both where closed

You always want to be right whatever the subject and this one is your job. I want to see traffic flow not be congested due to daft road widening schemes which INCONVIENIENCE people and make journeys longer wasting peoples time.

What smarter transport choices do you expect people to make? As I already said i is my belief that narrowing roads slows traffic flow, increases journey times and hence pollution thus increases.

Why do you intentionally misinterpret what was said. If you actually thought about it then you'd recognize that slower journeys because of narrower roads means it takes longer for traffic to move along and hence motor vehicles will excrete more noxious gases.

And so an update, a message saying I had a telephone appt which they then changed to a double to deal with two issues at once. From originally booking to the appt has been four weeks, so disappointed, but appt booked in.

What have I said that has upset you? So, I've experienced my first problems with them getting a telephone consultation but hey, after a chat today, it's supposed to be booked in next week. I'll have to see what if that happens.

thought it had been bought last year and was being converted to a family home