northlondoner

What on earth makes the Guardianistas so irate about this bloke's plight. He broke the law, end of. This asperge's diagnosis smacks of recent invetion - no matter how many "eminent" experts testify on his behalf. You have no idea how annoying this kind of "Brits in Peril" furore is to those of us of a commonwealth bent.

KK - you did absoluetly the right thing. In fact you're to be congratulated on your restraint. Hugs - chill the feck out. Shouting AQ on a london bus will always attract a hostile reaction - whether or not you are mentally disturbed. If he had tried it in Peckham he might have got an even more robust response.

Wise Guy! (See what I did there?)

Appeal. If you need help consult the very useful Appealnow.com

R and A I toook a photo recently of these disgraceful pests parked on a double yellow line with one wheel on the pavement. I shall shortly be passing this on to Southwark for their comment. And Garnwba - as has been pointed out - no one seems to be questionin the amount being charged for "illegal" parking. The beef is about the wardens making nuisances of themselves yet parking willy nilly - and getting away with it. Try to keep up

Jimmy, I worry about this approach to handling anti-democratic elements. Surely exposure to a wider audience does only three things: 1. Gives wider exposure to hateful and damaging propoganda - possibly seducing those already vulnerable to "radicalisation" 2. Gives these views a kind of credence - being broadcast on an institution like the BBC lends them a specious reflected respectability 3. Inflames opinion, causes offence and heightens tensions. I think the root of my unease is the presumption of moral equivalence - ie all views are have the same moral right to be heard - the same moral weight, as it were. I don;t think that presumption is right. Not all views are equally deserving of a fair hearing. Is that totalitarian? Not sure.

Santerme, I respect what you say -especially as one who has fought for his country.But is it safe for any democracy to allow free reign to a tiny group who would threaten the democratic rights of the rest of us? I believe that test could also be applied in the case of Nick Griffin. Magpie, much of what you say also makes sense - but that coersive tone leaves a slightly sour taste in the mouth.

Being lounged doesn't mean the discussion has been banned. It's just been located to another area, FFS! Just means scrolling down a bit. And try the lounge - some of the best debates are on there.

Actually, feral youths.

Foxes, my dear, foxes. Do not fret.

Re stool softners, the Reggae Reggae post is also relevant

The guy owning the place replacing Chopsticks told me its going to be a south Indian vegetarian.

A friend of mine says he chased across the Rye by a rhino one night last week. It was probably only a unicorn. Also, I just paid fifty pounds for eight legs of venison. Is that too dear?

Yeah, this really sucks,

Special glasses to detect when traffic lights have turned red.

HonaloochieB Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > breadcrum45 Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Went past the gun shop on LL today only to see > its > > gone. What happened? was there no longer any > call > > for that on LL. > > Lemme put it to ya this way, BC45. > You sayin' there be no caaaall fo' us to be > packin' heat in the ends. > You be trippin' motherf....r. Seriously. The sh!t > be here the same way it was when Target Arms first > opened. Word. > The call be here, blood but it be requiring mo' > subtlety than a water-cooled tripod-mounted > machine gun. Fool. > I be in mournin'. Is this meant to be a West Country brogue?

Uh, what is this pop up restaurant you speak of? Sounds like Come Dining but underground rave stylee.

slims Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > im sorry NORTHLONDONER,but if you love someone or > something,it would deeply upset you, if all the > dogs life you have looked after him,and people are > doing things that may cause you to lose your > dog,you would be very angry,what makes you think > im thuggish?because my occupation and crb dont > represent that.or is it something else,please dont > stereotype me please.or is because im 6 ft 2,what > gives you that impression.because im sure if you > ask the local school children there opinion would > be very different,or even the parents.i think as > mature person you should think before you > stereotype me.you think my dog should attack > me,why.The big white and brown dog hasnt troubled > nobody,or maybe your just one of those people who > see a big black man,with a big dog and have a > problem.Because i just cant understand why you > would say this: > > As someone who lives very close to where this > happened,(and sometime sees it strutting around > with it's thuggish owner ) I too feel very > strongly that this creature needs to be dealt with > before it attacks someone. But hoping it savages > the owner is a pretty vile sentiment. > > what is thuggish about me?please tell me. why does > the creature need to be dealt with? > > and by the rspca came to my house,and they could > tell the dog was well looked after.and left. Slim I was not describing you as thuggish. I think I have seen you with the brown and white dog and it's always leashed and under control. I was objecting to the threatening tone of your post. And as a big black man myself I am not going to describe someone as thuggish merely because they are black. I was refering to another person and another dog - which is always off the leash and has now shown how dangerous it is by destroying someone's pet. That makes them thuggish.

jollybaby Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > On a similar theme does anyone know what they are > filming near elephant and castle? The yard next > to Dragon Castle is filled with location trailers > etc Is this not the Clint movie? See earlier related thread.

slims Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > just to let everyone know,i own the brown and > white dog,and the rspca came to my house,because > someone on here decided to call them.now my dog is > in the house for the few hours im at work.the > person who said he left alone all day,this is not > true,i work in a primary school,and spend every > lunchtime with my dog.my dog did not attack no > cat,and my dog does not make mess on the street as > he only goes grass.all im going to say for last > time,is do not bring my dog into these > topics,because the dog whining isnt mine,he barks > very loud and clear.And he is always under > control.i hope the person who called the rspca > knows what they are doing,because my dog is well > cared for,and there has never been a problem with > any of my neighbours,and if my dog was taken away > for no reason.i hope u have the courage to reveal > yourself.so i think your confused with another > dog.i love my dog,and anyone that does anything > which may harm dog will have problems Dont come on here and threaten people.

SteveT Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > There are far too many incidents like this and the > owner has to take full responsiblity, but even if. > prosecuted nothing much happens to them. > Banned from keeping a dog or a fine, one can only > hope that the dog eventually turns on it's owner, > now that would be a result. As someone who lives very close to where this happened,(and sometime sees it strutting around with it's thuggish owner ) I too feel very strongly that this creature needs to be dealt with before it attacks someone. But hoping it savages the owner is a pretty vile sentiment.

This is a classic thread!>:D< Entertaining, witty, scary, erudite, informtative. We even squeeze in some Latin.Respeck E Dulwich, respeck!

This is a classic thread!>:D< Entertaining, witty, scary, erudite, informtative. We even squeeze in some Latin.Respeck E Dulwich, respeck!

Wait. Wait. Cyclists complaiing about cars jumping red lights?

Sorry to hear it john. Hope they catch the a-hole.