Dogkennelhillbilly

Fly Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > So if > you have 3 cyclists in the house you can't do this > so still need a car. Cobblers.

Fly tippers aren't residents too cheap to pay ?16 - they're mostly dodgy shitheads who've been paid to take the rubbish away.

i heard the clown was taken into custardy

I believe they will all take shoes too. If it's run by a charity, then the best clothes might make it into stores. Other clothes will be sold by the kilo to raise money for the organisation that has the bin. Stuff that's not suitable for sale as clothes will be sold as bulk textiles for rags.

nxjen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Perhaps it's irony, perhaps it's not. It might be steely. I expect if you took it into Dulwich DIY they'd be only too happy to tell you which metal it is. They've always been very cheap, knowledgeable and friendly to me.

The textile bin by The Plough is operated by Gaia, an extremely *unusual* Danish organisation with all sorts of *quixotic* ideas about how to cure AIDS. A quick google of 'Gaia clothing bins' will give you many, many sources of info. I would not use that bin.

Quantity is not the same as quality (as the verbosity and volume of certain posters' posts prove).

bobbsy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'll help dogkennelhillbilly out... > > Walk - which many people cannot do for any > appreciable distance > Cycle - as above > Bus - slow and polluting > Tube - oh there isn't any > Train - slow and expensive. > > So yes, losds of viable options in SE London... driving in SE London is not cheap and reliable. The vast majority of SE Londoners take the vast majority of their journeys without the highly polluting vehicles that will be taxed further.

bil Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > bil Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > I don't understand this method of penalising > > > people without first providing viable > > > alternatives. > > > > There are many viable alternatives to high > > pollution cars. > > > Dogkennelhillbilly...please explain those > alternatives. I'm sure that will help those people > with old cars who can't afford the upgrade. It ain't rocket science but luckily you've got 7 years to figure it out.

bil Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I don't understand this method of penalising > people without first providing viable > alternatives. There are many viable alternatives to high pollution cars.

"Awful poo lady" Gillian McKeith, using the ATM at the co-op.

Where do you propose the bus stand goes instead?

Don't forget to ruffle the feathers of a goose on Goose Green. The birds don't like it a huge amount but it's considered good luck among the fans. Do spot other DHFC suppprters by their blue and pink scarves, and give them the traditional fans' greeting of "have a go, big man!".

Good to know - the council website is a bit ambiguous

I don't know if you can take fridges to Devon St, they're not mentioned: http://beta.southwark.gov.uk/bins-and-recycling/recycling/recycling-centres/reuse-and-recycling-centre?chapter=2 you might have to get a pick up from your house Refrigerants are huge greenhouse gases, it's really important to get them captured

How good is this place? Is it two exclamation marks good or just one???

I wonder if the difference is down to the fact > that in Dutch cities pretty much everyone cycles ? > young and old, fit and infirm ? and no-one wears > lycra. Are you familiar with the concept of "cognitive dissonance"? I despaired when Boris launched one of his > London cycling initiatives and appeared alongside > Bradley Wiggins. Why? That isn't going to > encourage 'ordinary' people (eg the not-very-fit > middle-aged) to cycle to work. It's like using > Lewis Hamilton for a 'safer driving' campaign. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13365580

20mph

Laur Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Usually in public places you have to get > permission / complete a release form No.

"The problem". Yes, God, if only society treated travellers with only a bit disapproval...

Cushman & Wakefield is sn estate agent/property management company, not a security company.

chrisbeach Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > peckham_ryu Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Strangers come to town; construction and scrap > are > > both staples of itinerant work; scaffolding is > > stolen. That might be a case of "two plus two > > equals five", but then again it might not. I'm > > suggesting suspicion, not marching with > > pitchforks. > > "I rest my case," Mr Straw added. > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/428915.stm Almost 20 years ago a bloke on the radio half-heard some other bloke on the radio say something and that proves something?

Ooh, saucy! (Yes, I agree).

Jeremy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Never been to 'Turtle Bay'. But it looks like > Disneyfied Caribbean-lite for white people. Maybe > an apt metaphor for the rapidly changing > demographic of the area. Bah humbug. If you really thought the authentic Caribbean or Peckham was so great, you'd live there. But you don't - you live in New Cross and post thousands of times on the East Dulwich Forum.

diddly28 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > They should just scrap then entirely. All they do > is delay traffic and have it stood around > needlessly and increasing journey times. I agree with you that there are too many cars in London but i don't think scrapping them entirely is going to work.