Dogkennelhillbilly

uncleglen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > They all think that everyone else > has got one so they need to have one. This is, to > some extent, true. It's 100% true some of the time?

The kids are alright.

"Why would you remove anything from the curriculum dogkennelhillbilly?" Because there's not an infinite amount of time and teaching resources available. If you add one thing, you have to remove another.

Jules-and-Boo Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Knife danger is way down on the curriculum What on the curriculum would you like to remove in order to make room for lessons about the dangers of knives?

Jules-and-Boo Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I don't think schools' DO enough to educate > children on the dangers of knifes and weapons. Or, you know, parents could do it instead of adding it to the "list of things schools should teach our kids".

JohnL Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > KidKruger Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > wow - recipe for disaster with a care home next > to > > a huge and busy road junction that has > absolutely > > no provision for pedestrians. That will have to > > change. > > They'll go for the Trump solution. A huge wall > along the south circular. ...and Sydenham will pay for it.

Zoe Wanamaker in Dulwich Wood.

Louisa Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Could we get this back on topic please, quite a > serious issue at hand here. > > Louisa. This indeed, Louisa, right again.

peckham_ryu Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Rosetta Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > They aren't the police. This is a civil matter. > > The exemption in sub-paragraph 2(b) applies to > anyone. If the CCTV relies on the engine, it's > allowed. I am not convinced that CCTV is "machinery". I don't think it qualifies for the other subparagraph either

South Dulwich, she means.

Seabag Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Cheryl Baker at Meat Liquor. > > Who is she? She invented Google.

Do you say "thank you" to the driver as you get off the bus? (Only a deviant would say thanks to the driver on a double decker bus, for obvious reasons).

Cheryl Baker at Meat Liquor.

Take care champ. That's awful.

intexasatthe moment Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > "There is a perfectly good sub post office in the > big convenience store next to Badger's Bakery, > opposite Dulwich Library." > > Not any more . Bugger, really? When did that happen? I thought I was just in there...

Virgin are absolutely useless. We are now on our EIGHTH rescheduled installation date. Sad!

I think my definition of unfair is different to yours.

There is a perfectly good sub post office in the big convenience store next to Badger's Bakery, opposite Dulwich Library. eckhamRose Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Absolutely no point complaining to the Post office > Management. It is now a limited company and is no > more a 'service' despite the fact that many hard > working posties are still nice and still consider > what they do a service. Post Office Limited runs post offices. Royal Mail plc does postal deliveries. The two are operationally separate.

You can't just throw random bits of metal in the blue bin. RTFM!

Their noses should be rubbed in it to stop them doing it again. (The owners' noses, I mean).

Pat Sharp, drinking coffee at the EDT

James Barber Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > WRT Sainsburys recycling centre. The council let > it get into a terrible unsightly pickle. > Sainsbury's after seeing no effort from Southwark > Council to clean it up asked for it to be removed. Whose responsibility was it to maintain cleanliness? What document was that obligation recorded in?

Nigello Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I think that some of the pavement belongs to each > individual business, hence the non-uniform nature. > I just think a little bit of joined-up thinking or > cooperation between the proprietors could work > wonders... ...or bylaws.

It's a war on motorists! They're trying to abolish Christmas! These days, if you say you're English, they'll arrest you and throw you in prison!