Dogkennelhillbilly

Eastlands Crescent...East Dulwich (as article said) or Dulwich Village?

Nightmare, I'm sorry to hear that.

Seabag Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Sue Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > siousxiesue Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > Me too but they're always empty! > > > > They were always quite empty even before they > > banned alcohol. They aren't in a great location > > compared to the other similar restaurants > further > > down Lordship Lane, I think. > > > > I thought their food was quite good but I > haven't > > been there since the alcohol ban and I'm sorry > but > > not surprised if they have closed. > > > > But good for them for sticking to their > > principles. > > > What are the principles they're sticking too? > > Sorry, I'm if being dim here Taking a wild stab in the dark here: the Islamic lack of enthusiasm for intoxicants? I'd be surprised if they were Wee Frees or ascetics but I could of course be wrong.

I blame latte-drinking gentrifiers. Or possibly people that shop at Iceland. I don't know, whichever is more unpopular.

Or, you know, go in and speak to them about it. Or complain to the council.

1) you're being inconsiderate in some way. Raising wipers is a way of letting you know. Are you blocking a driveway or a dropped kerb? Are you parked in front of the house of one of those people who think they own the street in front of their house? Or 2) there's no point to it

The track isn't owned or controlled by the Mayor.

Total NIMBY thread. I especially liked the posts moaning about overpopulation caused by other people living in London.

rahrahrah Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > There's hardly a dearth of coffee shops in > Pecknarm There is at that end

Went to Mem's. Guy tried to be patronising. Never went back. I doubt they miss me.

derwentgrove Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Top marks > for the virtue signalling much loved of this neck > of the woods Your misuse of the phrase suggests you don't even understand what it means.

That's silly. Triggering Article 50 doesn't mean negotiations can start: it means you start the clock to exit ticking and if you don't agree anything in 24 months, you leave with nothing. This stuff is complicated; the UK has lots of partners in this; it's going to take far longer than 2 years if it's going to be done well.

TFFT. I failed to write to Hayes to tell her how I wanted to vote - so I'm glad she voted in the way I wanted. Zelig Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Shame on Hayes. The vote wasn't about Brexit, > thats all done and dusted. The vote was about > supporting the Labour Party and leader of the > Labour Party and she has not done that. Shame on > Hayes. The interests of Corbyn and the interests of the party are not the same. The quicker he is dumped the better.

uncleglen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > They all think that everyone else > has got one so they need to have one. This is, to > some extent, true. It's 100% true some of the time?

The kids are alright.

"Why would you remove anything from the curriculum dogkennelhillbilly?" Because there's not an infinite amount of time and teaching resources available. If you add one thing, you have to remove another.

Jules-and-Boo Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Knife danger is way down on the curriculum What on the curriculum would you like to remove in order to make room for lessons about the dangers of knives?

Jules-and-Boo Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I don't think schools' DO enough to educate > children on the dangers of knifes and weapons. Or, you know, parents could do it instead of adding it to the "list of things schools should teach our kids".

JohnL Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > KidKruger Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > wow - recipe for disaster with a care home next > to > > a huge and busy road junction that has > absolutely > > no provision for pedestrians. That will have to > > change. > > They'll go for the Trump solution. A huge wall > along the south circular. ...and Sydenham will pay for it.

Zoe Wanamaker in Dulwich Wood.

Louisa Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Could we get this back on topic please, quite a > serious issue at hand here. > > Louisa. This indeed, Louisa, right again.

peckham_ryu Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Rosetta Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > They aren't the police. This is a civil matter. > > The exemption in sub-paragraph 2(b) applies to > anyone. If the CCTV relies on the engine, it's > allowed. I am not convinced that CCTV is "machinery". I don't think it qualifies for the other subparagraph either

South Dulwich, she means.

Seabag Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Cheryl Baker at Meat Liquor. > > Who is she? She invented Google.

Do you say "thank you" to the driver as you get off the bus? (Only a deviant would say thanks to the driver on a double decker bus, for obvious reasons).