expat

what gerry said

This is what I found http://www.scoresonthedoors.org.uk/business/london/156558/restaurant-cafe/curry-cabin#

>my 8" chefs knife He used your chelfs knife?!?!? No wonder you dumped him..

Well the terms many Japanese women use to describe their retired husbands, ?Sodaigomi? or oversized garbage and ?nureochiba? or wet fallen leave. I am not aware theat is gneric in Japan. Perhaps anyone 1 year younger then steve t and up should be terminated?

The well now present no more danger to the environment they say: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/11190710

Didn't Professor Hawkins say that a god was not necessary which is not the same as saying there is no god IMHO. Also did The Archbishop of Canterbury not say that "Professor Hawking's latest theories should be welcomed by believers in God"

Why as late as 80 surely as soon as people go on pension it is time?

polystyrene can AFAIK be recycled, that is not to say Sourthwark currently do so

I think that was james referring to the Camberwell Bath which will re-open in 2011. AFAIK the Dulwich bath is still scheduled to open end September 2010

Jeremy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The millionaire thing is a red herring, he won't > be using his own money to pay for hotels when > attending conferences, etc. I disagree. Even if the coalition forced the Foreign Secretary to share a room on trips if I could afford it I would upgrade myself to a single. No-one apart from possible his wife care who he f**** but if he has voted anti-gay before it is an issue

Hello Admin, Is there a way to hide whole threads akin to ignoring message from individuals? Thanks

showa58taro you can ignore somebody by clicking on the ":" next to 'post by'

Perhaps waynetta could post her/Viz top-tips on the appropiate thread for it....

Is Hague not a millionaire? If I was I would certainly not share a twin room but that is perhaps why I am not a millionaire. Did Hague not vote aginst gay rights?

I know we should not feed the troll but for the people that are interested in copyright: http://www.ipo.gov.uk/types/copy/c-other/c-exception.htm Permitted uses of copyright works You would not normally need to seek permission if you wish to use less than a substantial part of a copyright protected work (see below for information on the definition of "substantial part") . Additionally there are a number of exceptions in copyright law which allow limited use of copyright works without the permission of the copyright owner. These can be found in the copyright sections of the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended) (1.27Mb) Please note that this list is not exhaustive and particular care should be taken if you intend to rely on an exception: Non-commercial research and private study Criticism, review and reporting current events Teaching in educational establishments Not for profit public playing of recorded music Helping visually impaired people Time shifting Certain exceptions require you to give sufficient acknowledgment when making use of a copyright protected work. It is not an infringement of the copyright in a work if you draw, take a photograph or make a film of, buildings or sculptures or works of artistic craftsmanship which are located in a public places or in premises open to the public. Copyright is not infringed in any material when it is used in legal proceedings. Copyright is infringed where either the whole or a substantial part of a work is used without permission, unless the copying falls within the scope of one of the copyright exceptions. A substantial part is not defined in copyright law but has been interpreted by the courts to mean a qualitatively significant part of a work even where this is not a large part of the work. Therefore, it is quite likely that even a small portion of the whole work will still be a substantial part. All the other economic rights also apply where the whole or a substantial part is to be used, but it is worth considering whether the use falls within the scope of any of the copyright exceptions.

>It kind of amuses me that some of you think I'm still a "troll" and that this thread is a wind-up. I guess I did my job a >bit too well! I'll enjoy seeing you backtrack when the article is published. Publishing something does not mean you are nor a troll... >The reason I can't link you to the thread I think you would be amused by is that that forum has very specific rules which >disallow linking to or from other forums. *Cough* so you follow some rules? Any reason you can't post the board name?

Thank you sophiesofa

>The police refused to tell me what had happened... but I presume you know?

Loz Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Yep, expat, two words: John Lewis. > > Excellent service and they often price match. I am not convcinced what this means. Does JL match their prices to others or do you think they are very expensive? I am sure we could have payed less somewhere else and get the washerdryer delivered to the kerb. We would then have to pay somebody to take it two floor up and plug it in, as neither my wife nor I am in a position to do it. Prince is no gurantee against kerb delevery as Silverfox wrote: >It reminds me of the time Silver Vixen and I bought a big heavy cast iron bath from a poncey shop in Muswell Hill nearly 20 >years ago. It was expensive and by the time the taps were added and the shower connection it was very expensive. we paid the delivery men to help me take it up two flights of steps. Worryingly one of the delivery men was straining so much he had a nose bleed as he was struggling with it. There was an occasion though that I regretted a delivery driver delivering to the house. After taking a day off work a delivery driver turned up one afternoon. I watched him take two mattresses out of the back of his van on his own. He tucked a corner of each mattress under his armpits and dragged the mattresses across the road to my door

we bought a washingmachine dryer from John Lewis and they delivered in 2 floor up.

>Yeah the 95/5% split dates back to the formation of the landed gentry So there is no source for the 95/5 split?

>Central Government provides around 70% So if the coalition cut the 70% with 25% it will affect services - I am glad we agree. I followed the link you provided and the first item was: Recycling pilot scheme Recycling reduces the impact that our waste has on the environment. It also saves money by avoiding landfill costs. Southwark council is committed to doubling recycling in the borough by 2014. We are trying to make recycling as easy as possible so residents can recycle as many items as possible. A six month pilot programme of improvements is being introduced in some areas Peckham, Dulwich and Rotherhithe beginning in October 2010. My highlights in bold. I also checked my houehold waste which will be twice a week for now.

>All fundraisers target their marketing at people most likely to support their cause - for example someone who goes to a music >concert would be a more likely support the arts, somebody who buys pet food is more likely to support animal welfare. Patients >who have had a positive experience in hospital are more likely to be interested in how that hospital's charity has made a >difference to their care, and possibly in supporting it financially. >Let me put your mind absolutely at rest. We are a department within the hospital, but we will never have access to any patient >data. Every hospital has a DPA Officer and Caldicott Guardian to ensure that patient data is not used inappropriately. I do not think people is nessecary aginst giving money to Kings but they have 2 questions: 1. How did Kings get the name and address if not from patient records? 2. Why were some but not all inpatients tageted?

>Our Chief Executive has indeed written to you, and to all patients who have attended the hospital in the last 3 months. Well I have and have gotten no letter... >Let me put your mind absolutely at rest. We are a department within the hospital, but we will never have access to any patient >data. So where do they get the address of recent patient from?

>Central Government provides around 70% of the money that local councils such as Southwark spend So if the coalition in an effort to save more money cut what they give the councils the councils have to find the moneyh somewhere and IIRC they are not allwed to raise the council tax...