rupert james

Please post the plan

No. Not in my street. A ploy by Southwark to get all to wont a CPZ. Creeping death. Free CPZ permits for residents not Southwark piss up the wall fund

Please put it up now for all to see or will admin cancel it and all other posts?

I don't think that long time residents regarded this as a private road but a road for the garden centre and the building supply centre. Dropping off was part of the local fabric of life However since people have paid over the top for property they want to make sure they get all they think they entitled too. Story of ED I am afraid. Not the easy going area I grew up in. The past was far more easy and enjoyable. Now I suspect most in debt and must keep up appearances by safe guarding assets to borrow against. I worry about the tyre shop areal asset to the area. Does it now fit in to the precious I am special mob.

richard tudor Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Is this all to do with the development of the old > garden site and possible redevelopment of the > unlisted and of no architectural merit railway > houses? > > Laying down a precedent for the planning committee > in the future? If it was OK to use this road when the garden center was operating to park, why has this person/s only just started to make a fuss over people using it briefly. Sounds like they had no legal right over it before but trying to put their marker down for whatever reason. When they bought the house they must have known the road usage. The truth would be interesting

How high is this crane? Will anything be flying this low

Land registry details and price are in the public domain.

Who owns the road, her or the builders merchants or the old garden centre. Let's hope she does not try and put the tyre place out of business when people stop. Again this situation was there when they moved in.

Maybe she is trying to impose a rule/precedent to stop the redevelopment going through.

Sue Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I've just seen this email which arrived yesterday > :( > > Dulwich Estate & Fuller's Challenging our ACV > Nomination > > Peter Blair > London, United Kingdom > > 15 Feb 2016 ? LATEST NEWS: We have been informed > by Southwark Council today that Dulwich Estate, in > league with leaseholder Fuller's, is challenging > our Asset of Community Value (ACV) status for the > Half Moon Pub and its music venue. > > - Please do feel free to contact Dulwich Estate > about this, saying that you support ACV status for > the pub and would like to question them on their > motives for using charitable funds to challenge > its ACV status. Here is the email address of John > E Major, Chief Executive - > > [email protected] > > We understand that he'd particularly welcome your > views on this issue- . > > The Dulwich Estate. > The Old College > Gallery Road > Dulwich > London > SE21 7AE > Telephone: 020 8299 1000 > > You can find a full list of the Dulwich Estate > trustees, who have approved this action, here: > > http://www.dulwichestate.co.uk/about/the-trustees > > - Please do feel free to comment on the Fuller's > Facebook page here. They are a public company and > we understand that they would welcome your views > on this issue: > https://www.facebook.com/FullersBrewery > > - The Dulwich Estate Charity's registration number > is: 312751 and using this number or the name, > information is available on the Charity Commission > for England and Wales's website: > www.charity-commission.gov.uk. Do also feel free > to contact the Charity Commission for its view on > whether Dulwich Estate is using its charitable > funds appropriately for this purpose. > > Thank you. With your support we can save our live > music venue. We are many, they are few. Please > share this update as widely as possible. > > > Save The Half Moon on Twitter > > NEWS: Please RT. Our ACV status for the Half Moon > being challenged by #DulwichEstate in league with > @FullersBrewery. pic.twitter.com/JhSPsz26Zu > http://twitter.com If this is so important why dont you make them a financial offer they cannot refuse and sign a contract for a certain number of years with an escalation rent rise clause? You supply groups. Money where your mouth is comes to mind

Well said. I wonder how many will? There's a few who feel that passive aggressive online posturing actually amounts to something. Could you explain more Rodney

Of course, did you expect any other result? Southwark wanted it and the in the loop mob provided the votes. If the number of responses represents the view of the vast majority you have to be living on cloud 9. The whole process was a joke as many people never knew it was going on. My lane Cllr never went out their way to promote it. But they are Labour. Very few votes but again % numbers to push it through. Look at the letters sent out and the number of replies.

He could be better used cleaning graffiti that is suddenly appearing everywhere again. 2015/16 Tooley street/Queens Road Council office refreshments again came to ?169.000.00. Perhaps they are running out of money. Perhaps they now need biscuits.

Perhaps the 2004 flood horror could have been prevented if the drains and sewers had been maintained. Unfortunately they were not, hence overload. Could there be some truth in the above comment someone made earlier?

Does anyone give a flying f...

Even getting to and around the exercise machines is the same. Water and mud. A complete balls up

The charity has become a business to support the wealthy. Please explain

Dulwich estates are landlords who provide the facities for business to operate from. If people are not prepared to pay for these facilities what is the problem? Move else where, seems simple enough. If properties are let for what the estate asks this only confirms the commercial value. Is people are so worried form a co-op and rent the shops for the going rate and put what ever business they want in. I doubt if their pocket will match their mouth.

How many of these children go to the schools that big greedy Dulwich Estates support?

Many years ago they used to suck out rubbish from road drains. Cannot remember the last time I have seen this. If you look when walking take note of how many drains are blocked.

I too like to walk and see things change like the seasons. Different bins, overflowing rubbish brings joy to my eyes.

James Barber Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Dropped kerbs need planning permission. The > planning permission process involves posting a > notice on lampposts only these days - letters to > neighbours by planning officers generally no > longer happen. Neighbours can object to planning > applications. > You can check via the Southark Council website if > planning permission has been applied for. > They also need a Traffic Management Order - these > are decided at your community council by local > councillors. Again you can object to these. > > At the last Dulwich Community Council we had a > proposal for 3 new dropped kerbs for front garden > parking (3 different homes). Due to the current > administrations rules about double yellow lines it > would have meant the removal of 12 parking spaces > on Lordship Lane so we felt compelled to reject > the proposals. > > It sounds like this neighbour has jumped the gun > and planning enforcement could be called. Cllr Barber where exactly on Lordship Lane? Please comment on the current adminisations daft rules? Is the comment some one made pro bike correct?

How would it be if roads were CPZ and residents were issued with free parking permits. Suspect that off road parking would not be an issue. Visitors could be offered supplementary residents permits with time clock which would also be attached to the main permit.

Since when has commercial shops, rents , toy shop been part of the heritage of the area. Devalues the value of a petition.