DominickHide

Is this even in east dulwich? Youre not an MP for this area are you james? James Barber Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'm not sure if the friends group is still active > - does anyone know/have contact details? > > It has a Green Flag so well worth you contacting > Southwark Council to point out any issues - > [email protected]

Acceeeeeed

It has been known for pizza fuelled rats to drag toddlers from prams. I do belive its the buffalo cheese.

All good questions that should be answered asap. I still do not think there is a problem as the smaller speed humps still force drivers to slow down due to the fact cars are parked on either side of the road therefore the vehicle cannot drive with all 4 wheels directly astride the hump and so must slow down. Any drivers that do not slow down would not slow at full width humps either.

The place is alive with them. Mice, not cats.

:-)

Stick to to the rules of the road and no probs. Simps.

Well on the whole I like what they have done internally, including the gents. However, seeing the new kitchen hatch next to the gents loo makes me shudder.

Am torn - yes save and protect trees always. No, you use your ex cllr , for two diferent political parties, status enough with scared weak willed council employees so stop abusing your non rights. rch Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I could try, but they tend not to respond directly > to me because I'm not a cllr anymore. I suppose I > could copy Matt together with Gary Meadowcroft in > the tree dept and see if I get a response before > the tree dies...

Oh dear Barber. Mountain and molehill. Again.

Like most things that get ruined it is by selfish people. In this case parents, and in ED so called parents are the most selfish twats going.

Can you afford it? peggoula Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I didn't think the joke had anything to do with > the ED stall, just had to do with Greeks and the > way they deal with debt. And I can tell you > people, not necessarily politicians take it very > seriously. > Anyway, it is just an odd day for greece and maybe > I got a bit over emotional. > Looking forward to sampling the food anyway.

"Noticable"!!! You have got to be joking. Have you been standing there tallying for days on end? No. Barber, seriously, stop this now. You very nearly came a cropper with the CPZ fiasco due to your hatred of cars. Do not repeat it here. James Barber Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The we was my ward councillors and I several years > when we undertook to make these changes happen. At > various points former Cllrs Richard Thomas, > Jonathan Mitchell and current fellow councillor > Rosie Shimell. > > Hi wulfhound, > I agree. But we don't get a proportion of the > total value of the street to improve it. We > usually but not always get a relatively small > amount of devolved capital budget (?88,000 this > FY) to spend on projects covering the whole ward > of 5,250 homes. > > Hi Andrew1011, > I attempted to have UK stone used but was over > ruled by the Labour administration of Southwark > Council. I am an opposition councillor so I don't > get what I consider common sense as often as I'd > like. > > Hi Jenny1, > I would agree a larger proportion of traffic goes > East dulwich Grove from/to the west and up the > northern length of Melbourne Grove. But a > noticeable portion goes north south along both > sections - is it all local traffic to Melbourne > residents - it feels larger volume that that - but > I've not noticed many cars coming in and out of > the Melbourne/Lordship Lane junction. It could be > people then using Ashbourne/Chesterfield to reach > their streets across Lordship Lane or could be > residents. > That after all is what the study is meant to be > about. Working out the traffic flows before and > after the proposal so we can then decide what we > think should be consulted on. > IF it shows the closure shouldn't proceed it might > result in no consultation and the current bumps > being upgraded.

Oh yes please. Absolutely.

There has only been one person knocking on my door trying to get me to support their far fetched unfounded claims, not different people belonging to a 'group'. That person is a new resident. That same person has also started a website about ED that only campaigns for the same unneeded traffic calming non issue. https://melbournegrove.wordpress.com/ I never received any information about this so called 'groups' 'deputation' to DCC through my letterbox, maybe because they know my opinion? The info and clarity of data as posted by others clearly shows this is utterly unnecessary. Will DCC now NOT give money to this 'group'? Hawaii86 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > There isn't a 'ringleader'. It's a group of > residents. This sort of insistence of creating an > individual to target is why some avoid this > forum. > > I don't know what to say about people's rejections > of actual police data. So I'll make any future > contributions to a formal consultation process > rather than this thread.

There is no way the amount of cars the survey says travels along MG daily can possibly be true. I know! I am of the opinion that there is no need for any traffic calming measures at all other than the ones that already exist. I would happily join any group that fights these ridiculous aims. I think it is completley relevant that the ringleader of the group wanting all of this is a very new resident. The amount of money being wasted on a pointless feasability study is outrageous. Politicians trying to curry favour and forcing their anti car stance. There is absolutely no need for any of this.