Bicknell

@goldylocks You said..." (Conservatives , Dulwich Alliance - though they?re essentially one and the same as Clive Rates founded the Dulwich Alliance) " list of groups in dulwich alliance here https://dulwichalliance.org/ are you saying that if some one helps start a group and then stands as a local councilor, all the members of group now belong to that same political party???

@Waseley ltns in duwlich making buses slower. tfl has cut no.3. buses are what most peple rely on

see what local electn candidates say about dulwich ltns https://www.onedulwich.uk/news/where-do-local-candidates-stand-on-the-dulwich-ltns

DulvilleRes Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- " There are some things so grievous in public life that they can't simply be sidelined." grievous issues in local politics too like acess for blue badge holders

@CPR Dave choose a good councillor https://www.onedulwich.uk/news/choose-a-good-councillor

why does voting conservative in local elction send message to boris, but not to local labour party?

look at photos on twitter cars legally parked fire engine checked out acess at junction on way back someone told me new double yellows have painted further back up Court lane? anyone know?

if its a route for emergency services council shd have worked out if parked cars blocked access

one dulwich article on council hurting vulnerable people

confusion at dulwich village jctn last week ambulance didnt know allowed to go through this week, fire engine safety first. get more signs in.

rahrahrah Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > If we could get a segregated bike Lane on EDG / > Half Moon Lane, it would be much easier for people > to connect to Henre Hill and onwards via the > Railton LTN to Brixton tube with grab and go > electric bike. not sure theres room on these routes without delaying the buses even more

please dont ban thread. v useful info for many of us in e dulwich. thank you.

just got this from dulwich streetspace Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing to you because you made an objection(s) to one or more of the following traffic orders as part of the Dulwich Streetspace scheme statutory consultation process, which ran from 21 October 2021 to 11 November 2021: (a) TMO2122-015_DS Calton Avenue area (b) TMO2122-16_DS Champion Hill © TMO2122- 017_DS East Dulwich area (d) TMO2122-18_DS Melbourne Grove south (e) TMO2122-19_DS bus, cycle and taxi routes On 23 December 2021, having considered all valid representations received during the statutory consultation process, the Cabinet Member for Transport, Parks and Sport made the following decisions: ? That the objections received in relation to TMO2122-015_DS Calton Avenue area, TMO2122-16_DS Champion Hill, TMO2122- 017_DS East Dulwich area, TMO2122-19_DS bus, cycle and taxi routes are rejected based on the consideration of officer responses and available monitoring data, and to proceed with the making of these orders. ? That the TMO2122-018_DS (Melbourne Grove south) objections are accepted and that officers do not proceed with the making of this traffic order. September 2021 monitoring data indicated that the Melbourne Grove South traffic filter may be contributing to traffic reduction of cars on East Dulwich Grove Central, and this trend requires further monitoring. Amending this traffic filter may result in an increase of cars on East Dulwich Grove Central, which would be contrary to the Movement Plan 2019 aims and council policy. The reasons for the decisions and responses to the objections can be found in the Determination of Objections ? Dulwich Streetspace Review Report dated 8 December 2021 .which can be found here. https://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/ieDecisionDetails.aspx?ID=7524 The council confirms that the following traffic orders were made on 10 February 2022: (a) TMO2122-015_DS Calton Avenue area (b) TMO2122-16_DS Champion Hill © TMO2122- 017_DS East Dulwich area (d) TMO2122-19_DS bus, cycle and taxi routes These orders will come into force on 17 February 2022. You can request a copy of the orders by emailing traffic.orders@southwark.gov.uk In the event you wish to question the validity of any of the aforementioned traffic orders on the grounds that it is not within the relevant powers, or that any of the relevant requirements have not been complied with, then you may make an application to the High Court within 6 weeks from the date the order is made. The council will continue to monitor the grounds for objections and such feedback and future engagement activities will inform any necessary modifications to these orders. In accordance with the Cabinet Member?s decision, there will be a review of the Dulwich Streetspace measures in six to nine months after implementation of the traffic orders. Thank you for taking the time to provide your representations to the Dulwich Streetspace scheme. We look forward to working with the community to create safer and healthy active travel routes, encouraging the uptake of walking, cycling and public transport amongst residents and re-purposing the street space for the community and local economy Yours sincerely, Head of Highways

more questions than answers... https://www.onedulwich.uk/news/why-the-data-doesnt-add-up

not sure i agree @dulvilleres best adjustment is getting rid of all-day-all-night closure at DV junction because it displaces traffic 24-7 onto other roads. and carers, doctors, etc cant get through. school-time timed restrictions and exemptions better. and (imho)separate cycle lane on calton by all means change relationship with car. but put altneratives in first especially across DV. did you see tfl cutting frequency of number 40? going backwards not forwards. need to think of everyone - children on EDG and croxted walking to school, older people, people wiht mobility problems, carers, nurses, etc otherwise creating inequality

northernmonkey Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > We would all like more granularity eg directional > and timed, but overall my sentence is factually > correct council hasnt published raw data and methdolgy even tho it was promised so we cant know if council claims are true thats the problem

thanks for input @Jenijenjen you will never get 100% of people to respond. 25% is really high (havent checked yr figures but happy to go with)and southwerk said they were happy with this. so its a good snapshot of local feeling you run a consutlation, get25 per cent, thats good question is what you do with results tw0 thirds of those who took part from all 3 ltns said go back to what it was but southwark just puts in minor changes is that ok? agree with you about dv juncton. cause of all the problems imho. not necessary, not wanted. no idea why council insists on keeping it

rupert james Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Probably for those that have adopted a polar bear. thank you, made me laugh

traffic orders for duwlcih are up on southwark site https://www.southwark.gov.uk/transport-and-roads/traffic-orders-licensing-strategies-and-regulation/traffic-management-orders?chapter=5 look at drawing for calton ave. cant see how an ambulance gets through interesting that drawing done by MNRP - same as did options report. not really that independant, then. https://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/documents/s101520/Appendix%20F2%20-%20Options%20review%20Report.pdf

i am confused. @malumbu is Cllr.leeming?

southwark themselves said figures needed to be clearer. leader of the council said that. but nothing happened. They should have just been open and publihed them so everyone could see. why didnt they?

meet up with freinds and neighbours, and demonstrate against dulwcih ltns on Saturday 16 October see https://www.onedulwich.uk/news/protest-on-saturday-16-october-at-12-noon

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2021/09/25/two-thirds-residents-oppose-low-traffic-neighborhoods/ this was never a ballot, says councillor rose waht was it then? a waste of time and money...

agree with Legalalien that council process v. bad people lose faith @dogkennelhillbilly your talking about traffic and ltns, not if council can be trusted so maybe i should let what you said go. but its the council thts slowed down buses by pushing all traffic on to bus routes.

in case you missed this https://www.onedulwich.uk/news/two-out-of-three-reject-the-dulwich-ltns