Bicknell

think to make 2 lanes going north, so that traffic can turn R when others go straight on. means that 1 lane goiing south will be made narrower. not sure how tghat will work bus stop outside dv north closed

think better to look at data big diffrence in figures

here is southwark report London Borough of Southwark Air Quality annual status report 2023 figures diffrent from figures they gave before for 2023 sdt 161 is 8 east dulich grove (near junction with lordship). report says 2023 figure 25.3 but in 2023 council said figure was 36 LTN+Air+Quality+2023.pdf anyone work this out? Same with sdt 98 (south circular/underhill) – southark said was 40 in 2023 - now says 29.8

source/link for data, pls @Earl Aelfheah there used to be a dulwich data dashboard. but not on council website now

thanks for posting @ab29 intresting review of ltns

but thats what i was sayhing. Steep hill, no traffic and good surface - need speed limits for cyclists . jujst like need speed limits for cars, scooters, mopeds, etc etc. common sense.

cyclists coming down hill eg calton ave etc build up speed this thread about speed limit for all transport. seeing all the wood, and all the trees

its one thing to close roads with support from residents and businesses . another to force it on people who dont want it.

link to data, please earl. www.crashmap.co.uk shows just 1 in Calton in 2019

depends on the speed i think

i dont think it will

late to this but i agree with 20 mph for all road users

clean air dulwich? friends of dulwich square? not that unusual then

good to discuss issues -- dont understand why some want to close discusssion down on this thread

or maybe not school street programme at all. maybe big big increase in Moving pcns becajuse of something else