paco

Hi All I have used Andy Burke a few times now. He has: Replaced a tap Diagnosed a problem with a tap fitted by another company Sorted out a sink that was coming away from the wall Serviced the boiler He is reliable, charges are reasonable - with no surprises (a plumber quoted £75/hour, but didn't mention that excluded VAT) Highly recommended. Andy Burke 07983 688451 Simon

Unfortunately, some people didn't contribute in a constructive way - speaking over others wasn't useful. Did you speak up and say anything sensible or constructive? Maybe consider why people were angry. The Council want to impose the CPZ and constructed the meeting so that people wouldn't get the opportunity to see how others felt. This is not consultation. It's a con and it's insulting. I don't think Councillor McAsh's responses were well presented at all. Yes it was a small minority. A few people kept speaking over others. This was annoying. The majority of people waited their turn to speak. The Councillor didn't really address some of the questions asked and clearly didn't want an open meeting in the first place!

I would guess around 100 - 120 people. In other boroughs there have been court cases. This is only a done deal if we all roll over. I agree - their legacy will be a loss of trust in the Labour Party. I saw the look of shame on one Councillor's face as he left the building. It is only a done deal if people roll over and accept it. Other boroughs have taken court action Thanks for this information Richard. I hope others get involved - I will.

I have just returned from a consultation meeting on the Streets For People' at the Church in Barry Road. When I arrived, people were queuing outside the Church - the reason was that they had to wait their turn to sit in small groups to chat with a Councillor. It is clear that this was designed to avoid an open discussion on the imposition of a controlled parking zone (CPZ) in East Dulwich. It was also clear that the majority of people attending the meeting were not in favour of such 'divide and rule' tactics - and we ended up having an open meeting. I am shocked that a Labour Council could stoop so low as to treat the people they represent with such contempt and shocked that Labour Councillors would participate in such an exercise. We were told that it had been made clear on the website/eventbrite that this was how the meeting would be held - I have just looked, to see this is patently not the case - see screenshots. One Councillor stated there has not been any consultation on whether people want a CPZ - the views of the people they represent aren't courted - the Council knows best. This is at odds with the website that says: "Why your views matter We want your views on the Streets for People proposal in your area. In particular we want your input on what days and hours you would prefer the controlled parking to operate - it is important to answer these questions even if your own preference is not to have controlled parking." Why tell us our views matter and the pretence of consultation if this has already been decided? Only one person at the meeting said they were in favour of the CPZ- by a show of hands. Others had left by this point - in disgust. I had hoped to be convinced that this would be a beneficial thing for East Dulwich, but the Councillor failed to make the case for imposing a CPZ. This amounts to meddling by the Council. If the majority of people are in favour (or don't care), so be it. There is no guarantee that this can be stopped, but the only way there is any chance of stopping this is if enough people object to this. Perhaps those of us who feel the same way could get together and consider what action we can take. Shall we roll over or kick off?

I?m planning to do a chap called Brian Johnson?s Optimize Coach 300 day course. It?s been scientifically validated ? they have some great speakers/trainers in the faculty. It normally costs $1000 ? but at the moment two people can do it for $300. If you?re interested let me know. If you want to do the course, happy to share the cost. https://www.optimize.me/coach It starts 3 January. Feel free to PM of text me. Simon 07906 568843

I am. Where are you thinking?

HI ALL If anyone is local SE22 has a car with jump leads - any chance of a jump start - I have a flat battery. if you can help, (I will slip you a few bob for your time), can you call me on: 07906 568843 Thanks Simon

I'm also interested... Will PM you

I heard some techie talking about this... Do you like the idea!? :)

Don't know JohnL... Possibly. Do you mean re; criminal activity?

Sorry snoopy17 missed your message. Benefits: It's faster Is a requirement for SMART tech - it means that you would be able to turn your kettle on without having to get up, run your bath whilst you are travelling home etc etc. Think they are talking about it be used for cars- driverless..

Sephiroth, once again, I agree with you! All of this has to be stress tested and credibility checked. Which sources are you suggesting come from sites like David Icke? Currently looking at counter arguments. But also looking at the bigger picture, looking at how the rollout has been implemented, it raises questions. The knee jerk reaction towards anyone who questions the status quo is that they must be a crank. They must be a tin foil hat wearing, lentil eating, tree hugger. I am guilty of this reaction. When someone first knocked on my door talking about phone masts, I did think "Who is this crazy do gooder person?" But digging deeper into the issue uncovered some interesting information. A point made by Jeromy Johnson in TED Talk, 'Wireless wake-up call': "The science is heavily influenced by industry funding. This is a study by Dr. Henry Lai. He looked at 326 studies based on the biological effects of cell phone radiation. He found that about half of the studies showed effects and half didn't. That's pretty normal for this type of research. But what he found that was interesting was that if you looked at who funded the studies, 70% of the independent studies showed effects, and only 32% of the industry-funded studies showed effects." This article elaborates the story: https://www.seattlemag.com/article/uw-scientist-henry-lai-makes-waves-cell-phone-industry

If I get a real person... Car accident scams; I tell them I was involved in a car accident and I know who was driving the car, but don't know if he lives in Florida or Paris - it was a clown car and all the doors fell off. I ask them if they know where Mickey Mouse lives. They hang up. Or just ask them "Is that Aunt Sally? What do you want for tea?" etc. They hang up.

The scientific literature I meant. Not literature in general. That would be daft. Dr. Sharon Goldberg, Professor, clinical researcher and an internal medicine physician: "Wireless radiation has biological effects. Period.This is no longer a subject for debate. When you look at PubMed in the peer-reviewed literature, these effects are seen in all life forms: plants, animals, insects, microbes. In humans we have clear evidence of cancer now. There is no question. We have it; evidence of DNA damage, cardiomyopathy which is the precursor of congestive heart failure, neuropsychiatric effects." Dr. David Carpenter another public health physician "There's been no safety testing of 5G. The reason I think that it's dangerous is that there isn't any specific information to 5g but we know that radiofrequency radiation of 3g and 4g are associated with the whole variety of different human health effects. Everyone is going to be exposed to radiofrequency radiation more continuously and at higher intensities and that's going to cause more human disease." There are safer alternatives with the same benefits. See TED Talk, Wireless wake-up call, Jeromy Johnson We don't have to go back to the dark ages, unless you want to..? I don't have a problem with tech, as long as it safety tested. 5G hasn't been by all accounts, it would seem.