The model maker seems to have planted a whole bunch of trees down the road that Sainsbury's trucks deliver through - the bit of road between DHFC and the supermarket. I went along to the exhibition last week and was struck by the lack of communicative value in much of the presentation - especially the drawings/CGIs. I'm quite used to looking at working drawings and presentations but the ones on show were pretty incoherent. A lack of orientation, common scale, stretched perspectives, and wilful misrepresentation all combined to offer gloss over content. An example was the perspective view of greendale field from the greendale path side showing what looked like a stadium about half a mile away, all through forced fish-eye perspective. I'm grateful to thedukeofmoclar for the CAD scaling of the pitch as none of that information was clearly available at the presentation. There were some pretty spurious claims in the texts too. One referred to the 'underused road to the south of the present stadium that forms an unsatisfactory boundary to the houses on Burrow road'. Its not underused - must be hundreds of schoolkids, cyclists, dog walkers and joggers going through there every day. And I wonder if anyone has asked the residents of Burrow road what they think. The proposals have nothing to do with the survival of DHFC but development of commonly available land for private profit. Development creeps - Sainsbury's started it here, on the other corner of greendale (with wanley road) a four-storey block filled the entire site where there was a smaller two-storey building. Setting these precedents means that they might one day join up. I don't follow DHFC but want them to survive - I last went in about 1980, but the football club does not need to expand out of its current site. In fact, one of the display panels made the point that the current DHFC plot is too big for their needs. Much could be done by reconfiguring the current stadium - re-orienting the entrance etc. I'm also concerned about what the term 'public space' really means in these contexts. If the linear park (footpath) is merged with st. francis park does the whole lot go under lock and key (as st francis park does) with no real accountability for access? I think I'm rambling somewhat! Apologies. Hadley should not be allowed to build on open land regardless of the various social leverages they are trying to apply.