aerie

EDMP Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Older women is about 30-55 and no I don't own an > Xbox lol too busy! > > > > aerie Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > EDMP Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > Bit of banter everyone haha I was bit tipsy > > when > > > posting this didn't realise arguments would > be > > > caused!! Lol > > > > Don't flatter yourself. The altercation was not > > about you. How old are you. Is an older woman > to > > you about 26/7? > > As there are excited ladies here imagining you > > meant 60 plus and I do not believe you to be a > > granny sh*****. > > Is it true your x box is broken. Your historical posts, X box, iphone, mobile number, your curious business acumen, it's all there. lol

Alan Medic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I work with a woman who on her FB page posted > photos or a friend did of a girls night out. She > referred to themselves as milfs. If women do this > why do women find it upsetting if men use the same > terminology? AM, you have neatly answered your own non sequitur. Women can do it tongue in cheek and perhaps in a self deprecating manner, as they are not threatening themselves, they are in control. Men who do it, albeit very young and posted here only about his XBOX and tipsy, bored and lonely, describing ladies as MILF on a local family centric forum and requesting them (if they 'up for it') to contact him is an entirely different yarn. I do not understand how you cannot see the difference.

bzgeo Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > that betty store that opened is supposed to be a > milf hangout, oh and any gastropub. O Lord, there are two of them

EDMP Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Bit of banter everyone haha I was bit tipsy when > posting this didn't realise arguments would be > caused!! Lol Don't flatter yourself. The altercation was not about you. How old are you. Is an older woman to you about 26/7? As there are excited ladies here imagining you meant 60 plus and I do not believe you to be a granny sh*****. Is it true your x box is broken.

Alan Medic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Review on Amazon for their Fire Stick: > > I bought this as an electronic babysitter, for my > husband, who is five. Oh, wait, not five, 48. I > was pig-sick of him watching Netflix on his mobile > phone, with his netbook pinging up Facebook > messages, with the TV on full blast, and the sound > from his Netflix leaking out of his earphones, > because he had that on full volume as well, to > counter-balance whatever was happening on the TV > he wasn't watching. It has worked a treat, as he > now watches endless hours of crap on the big TV, > while his netbook and phone ping Facebook messages > at him, and he lies on the couch, re-arranging his > crotch, and grunting. > > The installation was easy, despite the fact that I > only have full use of one hand, I didn't need any > screwdrivers, and I'm not allowed hammers anyway. > I did stand on an apple that the dog had taken > behind the TV, for dog-reasons, and it squidged > between my toes a bit, but I don't suppose that's > a universal installation issue, not everyone > having a dog that hides fruit behind the TV. > > The plug-and-play nature of the device meant that > I was able to install without asking for help from > a man, and I didn't even break any fingernails. > I'm relatively certain I've deleted any links to > my social media from Amazon, so the husband won't > be able to ferret about, at two in the morning, > while he's watching something with boobs in, or > yet another concert from the time period when I > was being potty-trained, and see all of the nasty > things I say about him. > > For me, it has been ?35 well-spent, although the > glut of adverts offering it for ?25 have been a > bit of a kick in the crotch, I could have spent > the extra ?10 on gin, but it would have been cheap > gin, so there would have been no real gain. You should have your own column/radio/tv show. and soon

Zebedee Tring Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Interesting post, flyer. As far as I can remember, > there is nothing in the legislation relating to > elections that deals with misleading statements > during the campaign; misleading > representations/statements were more the province > of the Trade Descriptions Act and the like. > However, I may be wrong about this ... and indeed > I hope that I am wrong. However none of our politicians 'came to the table with clean hands' did they? the only honourable man acting as a brake was Clegg. > > Someone should get a counsel's opinion on this - > indeed someone may be doing this already.

or Bloody Norah !

A parliamentary rejection of the referendum would surely mean those who ordered it, at a time when jingoistic fervour was running high in the sports world, Glastonbury (the all important young vote), and the vagaries of the British weather, would be forced to accept the consequences of their poor judgement, or even recklessness. He has broken his contract with us. And the prospect of bumbling Boris in the top job, should be enough reason for Dave to stay and weather the storm, et tu Brutus and all that. Where is his backbone?? Where is his valour? And where is his honourable intent? The Queen could refuse Dave's resignation? Thank you Helen Hayes for this forthright statement.

If May 'gets in' there will be no police force left. You read it here first.

red devil Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I saw a couple of old biddys being interviewed on > the news last night, when asked why they voted to > leave, they replied along the lines of... > > ''We're old enough to remember the old days, we > don't like being bossed about'' > > Perhaps the next referendum should be whether or > not we introduce euthanasia... this is truly wicked, but made me laugh - there is a questionable moral validity to older older people not voting as a referendum of this nature decides the future and theirs will by definition be short. However this is a democracy, and as yet there is no upper age limit, or even Logan's Zimmer Run.

Jah Lush Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Yes. Copy and then paste on here.

void

void

Seabag Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Chinese wine > > Bent bananas > > 3kw kettles again > > Repeats of Dads Army Don't tell him, Pike !

Blah Blah Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Yes it's as though the result has given licence to > the racists that we all know do exist in places, > to behave disgracefully. I know that's not what > you wanted to see Louisa, none of us did. > > That's a really worrying analysis Jaywalker. Of > course the drop in sterling has signalled the > start, and they have already announced expected Re your first sentence, encoupling Louisa's dismay: and not intending to add fuel to the fire = I have a 'well to do' friend I have known well for years, been through thick and thin etc, Because I am not sure her speech would be printed verbatim, half the point of this post is lost twice using words which shocked me, we are allowed freedom of speech now apparently. You think you know someone.... and realise there was a lid being kept on, now blown away, as though her ghastly assumptions of racial superiority are now somehow valid. I am sad for the spoilt friendship, and sorry for anyone falling out through opposing views. And feel as though I have been part of a weird social experiment, an exercise in divisiveness. > > >

void

void

void

Alan Medic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > #regrexit seems to becoming popular or voters remorse

woo woo, thank you, and trust you picked up the symbolism? implication? thank you Jah Lush !

The inside part of Peckham Rye Park is dog/poo safe, I don't understand why you would picnic on Goose Green, risking curious dogs running up sniffing children and food? They wee also, it is not safe, toxocara canis, flies, apart from exhaust fumes and with four little ones? you would probably need a sheep dog anyway. Did you post this on Family Life thread? as an alert, it would be more helpful and more widely read there I would think. It isn't the grass's fault.

According to the Gridiron, it is referred to as 'voters remorse' I also think Thursday should have been declared a wash out, torrential rain and floods, good thing we are not all superstitious. And now into the long 'it's got to get worse before it gets better' stage a period of adjustment and transition. If only any of us could hand on heart say and believe we trust and have faith in our leader/s, which is what we all need now more than ever, there is not a good man among them. It's a shame Cameron is leaving so soon, and not be required to live and work with the consequences of his 'let's have a referendum' party game.

I have the Stones 'Can't you hear me knocking' hurling itself around my head but cannot post a link, thought the sentiments appropriate, happy listening y'all, freely available on wonderful youtube

civilservant Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > why all this talk of separatism and wall-building? > that's the province of the Out-ers. > the EU was (is) about bringing down borders and > allowing free movement and free trade. People > like these for themselves but not for others - it > was a selfish vote. > > so sorry to hear about your predicament, Working > Mummy. there are many paradoxes - I've also got > several European in-laws with British families who > live and work and pay taxes in this country who > weren't able to vote, unlike UK expats who could > and may have even voted 'Out'. we can only wait > and see how things work out for them and their > families. I cannot imagine that ex pats in Europe would vote 'out' as many of them have a hard enough time as it is beaurocratically, they really would be shooting themselves in the foot. (much bandied idiom today)

Jules your heading belies the true intention of your narrative