Snoopy17 - It is clearly irrelevant! The OP?s request was for assistance locating his / her bag. The OP wasn?t asking for a cross examination on the circumstances, but only help locating the bag as he / she very plausibly suspects the thieves would have quickly discarded the items of no value to them. How the bag was lost doesn?t make any difference to whether people can keep an eye out for it. Had the OP asked for feedback on how / why it happened, or how to prevent it happening again or happening to others, then your question would have been relevant. Likewise, it may have been relevant if the OP had asked for help locating the sub-human bottom feeding scrotum bag(s) who took it, but again that wasn?t the point of the OM. If you can?t see the insensitivity in responding to a clearly distressed post with a question the clear inference of which is some element of blame on the victim, then (to use your own words) you need to ?grow the hell up?. And if you can?t see the inference in your question, then I?m sorry but you should be more self-aware and shoulda perhaps refrain from social media. I suspect snoopy17 is the type who will think they?ve ?won the argument? even though they are clearly in the wrong, so let?s not respond to any further posts from snoopy17. On a separate point, isn?t it a little concerning that a children?s nursery is a crime scene? Surely they should be secure? They must surely have CCTV (which would assist working out which route the perpetrator(s) left and therefore locating the bag).