neilson99 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Pink Panther if you read my post properly you'll > realise that I was not celebrating in any way the > fact that they got paid so little. I suspect your > just looking for some reason to latch onto this > issue and do your best Angry of East Dulwich > impression. > > Perhaps it was located in the wrong place in the > car park such that you got a little damp on the > way to such an illustrious and well appointed > stadium, (you could always take 30 seconds and > walk around it rather than through it?) but only a > complete simpleton would think that evicting a > source of revenue (however meagre and badly > managed that has been) might not be the best way > to helping DHFC to a financially sustainable > future. > > Hope DHFC and their poor rain soaked fans are > pleased that they are putting out of work some > people who seemed to me to work their backsides > off, do a really great job and always did it in a > polite and friendly way. Let's hope that karmma > doesn't kick in and that they get relegated this > season, they'd deserve it if they did! Well you certainly haven't read my post properly. As I stated in the first place, they worked on too many vehicles simultaneously, not just under the canopy area, so on occasions you literally couldn't reach the turnstiles without getting sprayed. This created a clear H&S issue. I suspect if the relevant council official(s) had been summoned to have a look they would have been distinctly unimpressed. At one recent game, when the match ended, there was a bloody great 4x4 parked right across the exit gates (with several other vehicles behind and in front of it) being sprayed with high pressure water jets while 600 people were attempting to leave the ground. If anyone thinks that's acceptable I don't feel they're being very realistic. The bottom line is that it's DHFC's ground and DHFC's car park. The whole place was clearly built as a football ground, with a car park for those attending football matches, not as a site for a car wash. The shysters who used to run DHFC decided in their wisdom that they could make a few quid by accommodating the car wash. By contrast the new owners appear to have qualities such as competence, efficiency, and adherence to proper business principles. If they decide that they no longer wish to sub-let part of DHFC's premises to a completely unrelated business it's their prerogative to take the appropriate action to move it out. DHFC has no moral obligation whatsoever to accommodate a car wash or any other business on its land.