fredricketts

They will probably build several blocks of flats, I should imagine Southwark Council would like to get their hands on it. they just leave it till it wants pulling down, as its not a listed building.

They have not been answering their phone for about 18 months I complained to their headquarters twice and in the end I had a row with the staff in there and was told, I was not wanted in there pharmacy, so I went somewhere else, that was three months ago.

The pollution in Dulwich is quite high, and its because Southwark Council has forced thousands of cars from minor main roads onto all our main roads, trebling the pollution and traffic, increasing Ambulance, Police and and fire services response times. (facts) Why because some big wigs in other countries say we need to get to net Zero so put in LTNs as they will make our streets safer. So far I have filmed about 20 over ten ton lorries backing down my road out onto the main road Lordship Lane. They don't care a monkeys for the people who, pedestrians, people who live above the shops, the schools that are on the main road, of which some, they have not long built to do away with a police station. They have allowed more flats above what used to be Somerfield's, let them build on their customer car parks and the same was with the site M&S,

Her name was Natalie, I think visitors can fill it in. over the years that I have been in East Dulwich the Council has slowly tried to bring in CPZ, first they Converted The Coop upper part in to flats, the liberal Party James Barber told the residents of Ashbourne grove that they were for letting but turned out to be for person released from prison, but it still had no place for parking places and no where to put the bins, they still went ahead. they turned the coop rear car park into part of the shop the same happened to M&S. and what with the outsiders all coming to the market, it made parking in the area worse so they could go ahead with the CPZ, they then closed of Melbourne Grove with an LTN, which has forced thousands of cars onto the main roads, and that made parking worse and trebled the pollution and traffic on all main roads. so much for safer less polluted streets. pulled a Pollicisation on the main road down and turned it into a school. Its one big Con caused by the non existent CLIMATE CHANGE. and a legalised Robbery scam for MONEY One of several lorries backing down Ashbourne Grove out into the main Road Lordship lane

Just been to the Meeting at the back of the church and you can hand the consultation forms in there and talk one to one of the Councils representatives. if the majority say NO to the CPZ they assured me that it will not be put in

Could not agree more. the Council allowed the car park behind the coop to be built on, and as a result, more traffic on the side roads. now they want to bring in CPZ, I have lived in Ashbourne Grove for over 60 years, and the Council have tried several times to put CPZ in the road and have failed, because the road has so many crossovers, and now they want to charge us for any visitors that come to visit us. they have shut off Melbourne Grove with a LTN and it has caused more Chaos with artic lorries having to back out onto the main road in Lordship lane, forced a least a thousands cars and vehicles on to the main roads, causing more pollution and chaos in redirecting traffic when there is road works, and that's nearly every day. Ambulances and the police response times have also been affected, at one time an ambulance had to turn and go back because of the traffic congestion caused by these LTNs. and yes the Consultation form has been rigged in favour of the Council getting its own way, and does not tell you where to send the form. questions 8 and 10 gives them the permission to go ahead and count as a yes we want CPZ, Just another stealth tax as we all ready pay exorbitant Rates to pay for street maintenance. I think they want you to drop it in at the meetings. in which case it will be a waste of time as they will do what they want not what the people want, another stealth tax for the Council to waste, as we already pay for the street maintenance in our exorbitant Rates. say no to CPZ and LTNs

The Council allowed The Co op rear customer car parking area to be built on and as a result, the roads around, had customers parking in their road. and the Councils answer to that is CPZ in the whole area. the residents of Ashbourne grove do not want CPZ, as they feel its just another stealth tax, and that the money is going into street maintenance, for which we already pay exorbitant High Rates. another income for life for the Council and will increase year on year like the garden waste bins and cycle bins.

Its all for the Money. supposed to make safer streets, Ashbourne grove, since the LTN in Melbourne Grove has been put in I have caught on camera over 20 lorries some artic coming down the road, not been able to get out, so they back all the way down the road into Lordship lane, which is illegal. Now they want CPZ in the whole area and yes they have manipulated the Times Question, and if I read it right only 16 people contacted them to introduce CPZ. it gives the Council a income for the life time of the Council and will increase every year. those who paid for crossovers will have double yellow lines put in front of their houses to stop them parking on the road. its one big scam connected to Net zero and climate change rubbish. The LTNs in Melbourne Grove have forced all the vehicles onto the main roads there by trebling the pollution, remembering Southwark Council pulled down a Police station on the main road and built a school Lordship Lane. it has trebled the traffic on our main roads. one time in East h road because of road works and the LTNs traffic was diverted, and had a 3 mile detour down to Kings college and back to Hearn Hill

City Airport does not Help with there flights in and out, I have lived in East Dulwich since 1963 and the planes were noisy then but now they have got worse because of bigger airports and more flights. they cause more pollution than all the cars in London, yet the Govs are not prepared to solve the problem. instead they lock you up for saying thing on FB and X. Its a mad Country we are living in with all these loony lefts dictating how we live our Lives.

Southwark Council gave permission to change the offices above the Co Op into flats for people coming out of prison, but withheld it from the Local residence.

Been against them from the beginning, if I can help any way, with computer work or as i have been doing spreading it in the different media groups. I live in Ashbourne Grove, I attended the last meeting protest in the village.

Haslev, Could not agree with you more, even pulling it down will be part of Dulwich history disappearing, for what; to overcrowd what was a good area.

Why not use the original ED police stn site in crystal palace/north? The police station in Crystal Palace Road, has holding cells and all the facilities necessary for East Dulwich, it served East Dulwich very well for years, Until some bright spark decided it was not big enough and decided to build a new one in Lordship Lane, and now it seems we do not need any sort of police station in East Dulwich. Now they have decided to over develop East Dulwich, and bring in more people and traffic, it seems to me, what with all these cut backs going on, because of the incompetence of Local Councils and the Government, Now is the time we need a police station, it?s probably one of the reasons crime figures are down, people just can?t be bothered anymore to report crimes etc, as nothing is ever done about them. And make no mistake crime figurers may be down according to the Gov stats, but they are still increasing and even more so because of the cut backs. WE NEED A POLICE STATION IN EAST DULWCH.

One hundred per cent right. But a wider impact on our society at large must be taken into account

Make Mr Barber Right. I would like to object to the granting of a 24 hour licence to the co-op at Lordship Lane SE22 for the following reasons: 1. We already have too many outlets for 24 hour Intoxicating liquor licensing in Lordship Lane. 2 The binge drinking and drunks in lordship lane every night has increased tenfold in the last 6 years, owing to the Government and Council policies, allowing night clubs and pubs to extend their drinking hours till the early hours of the morning, in residential areas, most of the time causing a nuisance to local residents. 3. We already have a parking problem at the end of Ashbourne Grove during the day time, and this is gradually getting worse of a night time, due to the clubs and pubs having extended hours, and to add, another outlet, all night will attract more cars and drunks to the area, causing more pollution and trouble to the area. I thought the council and the Government wanted to cut down on people binge drinking, yet now you are saying, you can drink twenty four seven. We will help you drink more by allowing twenty four seven drinking outlets. Really don?t make sense. You are, by allowing this, encouraging binge drinking, all day and night. Along with, ruining resident?s good way of life that they have enjoyed for years. I for one know that the area of Dulwich that I live in has slowly been deteriorating, through bad governments and councils changes to making profits and putting businesses profits in front of residents who have paid good money for their properties in order to live a nice peaceful life in a good environments?. That you are now destroying.