Why was this reported to the press in the first place? I don't understand how the majority of women on this thread find it acceptable, no matter where they are and no matter who they are with, to get their bits out in order to feed their starving child for "two minutes" (as quoted in the Daily Mail). Two minutes? Was it really worth it and to cause all this hassle? Come off it! I fail to understand the mentality of the majority on here (that appear to be women) that think they have a given right to do what they like no matter as to the consquences that are invited. Why do you have the right - the right over others that is? Why invite trouble from others - perhaps men, perhaps women - who get excited about boobs being out and about? Why should you just throw it back that they are the ones with the issues and are pervs? You know the problems out there so why provoke it? What about other religions that find such public displays embarrassing or against their faith? Do you care to look past your own nose? It has nothing to do with others not understanding what it is like for the mother who simply must feed on demand or their lack of intelligence. It comes down to common sense, manners, modesty and consideration for those around you in the society you have chosen to live. One assumes payment was offered and accepted for the article and assumes such money has been donated to King's MilkBank. KB