mako

Can further vouch for tricky Toby. Our daughter loved him.

Best post of the week imo Louisa Wrote: an affordable women's clothing > store? > xxxxxxx That's called a charity shop big grin

some of those photos are at the Dulwich Sports ground

Glad you stopped them DST

Donald I think you have called this badly. The nosey person would come over at the time and people on here just seem to be showing concern, so if it was my friend I would be grateful that someone cared. If the paramedics were already there then that is when you don't want people shoving their nose in.

I'm sure the main local Christmas tree sellers would donate a tree for some publicity. it doesnt have to cost taxpayers and would provide joy to many. It even gives the miserable forumites something to moan about with limited dog/children/bike/car/vegetable threads at the moment, so they too will be secretly happy even if too negative to acknowledge it.

I think their sign looks budget and the prices top end. Hopefully the food reflects the budget not the sign.

James, most meat eaters would be happier eating organic high quality meat, and if it would make you far happier then feel free to pay me the difference and I will eat exclusively meat that you describe. There is a fundamental trend that per capita consumption of meat is going up. Is this the trend you are referring to?

It's been suggested above that E.D is a bit of a meat fest but I actually think it's short of somewhere to get a really good steak. Am I missing somewhere?

How do I get a free kit pls

made it to work on the tea and ginger beer. thanks all

Thanks all. Trying the tea and then drugs tomorrow if no improvement.

Thanks

Thanks. Am doing most of that already, although not really through choice. Will give nettle tea a go if sainsburys have it.

I have poisoned myself on a pork pie. Need to work tomorrow so looking for magic instant ( ish) cure remedies...found a suggestion that aniseed was good, do aniseed balls count?

Fish, if your concern is people crashing into you I suggest you look where you are going rather than blocking up the pavement whist you are taking your blurry photos

A similar line was taken on the dogs thread where the argument put forward by a number of dog owners was that they didint like other anti social park users as if this was a defence of anti social/dangerous dog owners.

All the posters who keep saying 'breaking the law'are doing my head in. There are times when it is sensible to cycle on the pavement and doesnt adversly impact anyone. Have all these posters never gone over the speed limit driving(even at night on an empty motorway), even once?

good post jesska

Maybe offer a few coppers for it

Excellent article. It highlights that the way forward is to cycle on pavements. family travel has to be by car because it is just isnt safe enough on the roads for young children. It is generally accepted that cycling should be encouraged for health and environment and cost benefits yet in the formative years children experience driving as normal as it is so hard to get kids anywhere any way else. That doesnt mean reckless on the pavements but as Japan understands bikes are clearly part pedestrain part vehicle. most adult cyclists would then use roads mostly anyway as it would be quicker but shouldnt be stigmatised (or be breaking the law) if for part of journeys used pavements.

The helicopter ambulance was there so hope all involved ok.

Major incident on south circ near Bel Air park and the College. Road closed

Hopefully the meeting will put to an end the conspiracy theorists who keep referring to a blanket ban and that there was a hidden agenda. Instead the debate can move on to enforcement of current rules including fouling, dealing with out of control dogs off leads (please dont say they dont exist as we have plenty on this thread saying they are scared to walk their own dogs), and improving owners and non owners understanding of the others viewpoint ( for example lots of people dont want dogs running or jumping at them even if their is no danger. An apology when this happens would be nice rather than expectation from an owner that the recipient of said jump will find it funny). My suggestion would be the best chance of this is self regulation from the owners who with a strong Owners group could educate their members and put pressure on those who dont comply, including the bad dog walking businesses that i feel are responsible for many complaints.

Lee Apologies if you feel i misrepresented you as i actually agree with a lot of your post, particularly that the initial survey was poorly worded. However this shouldnt be used as an excuse to avoid the issues that do exist such as should there be on lead only areas, dog free areas, how to deal with enforcement of existing rules. I feel many on this thread havent been prepared to engage in this debate, instead citing their issues with other park users which could fill up plenty of other threads. Also assuming a ban has been proposed and that southwark are anti dog, when i have seen little evidence of either.