Vicanna

...'I'm a communist. Not a racist' in 2005, would he have escaped the ire and condemnation of the largely liberal press following his appointment as manager of Sunderland AFC, in spite of many more people being murdered in the name of communism under Stalin than those who were murdered by the Squradrismo under Mussolini and Himmler's SS units combined?

Looks like I've got under *Bob*'s skin. Disabled kid(s)?

Save your breath, edcam. After all, stick and stones may break my bones but lippy on the 176 will never hurt me. Shame we can't say the same about you, eh.

Having said that, whoever's replied with any of the naive conviction of DJKillerQueen to such an obvious wind-uo is a complete mong.

Apologies to all the retards out there. 'Losers' would've been more apropos given the circumstances.

Lots of pseudo-scientists and sociologists (a.k.a losers) desperately vying for their anonymous peers' inconsequential approval, too. Kudos to those who've lead them so easily up the garden path. No, really.

PaulK Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Vicanna Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Some of the people commenting on this thread > are > > so retarded it's not even funny. > > > Who do you mean? and please state your resons why Whoever is wasting their time attempting to counter arguments posted by disingenuous clowns like Louisa.

Some of the people commenting on this thread are so retarded it's not even funny.

There's a whole world out there, too, for when you tire of wasting your life away glued to the internet. Might want to change out of last year's clothes, though.

I'll pass, thanks. But perhaps you should give it a go, seeing as you clearly need to get out the house more often.

Bloody sad, more like.

Says the loser with just under 8000 bulletin board posts to their name.

Says the loser with just under 8000 mesaage board posts to their name.

I'd much rather sit have someone apply make-up in front of me than have someone who's clinically obese (or just plain fat) plonk their lard-arse next to me. Now that's inconsiderate.

If someone, man or woman, was brushing their teeth on the bus or the train, I could sympathise. But holding a mirror six inches from your face while applying some last-minute war paint doesn't hinder anyone. It's about as 'disruptive' as someone reading a book opposite you.

It clearly wasn't. Although some UrbExers (like myself) enjoy the thrill of evading the attention of night watchmen, we don't go poking around occupied residential properties. Nor are we interested in removing any objects from the sites we visit. Please focus on the OP; and try not to make any more painfully stupid remarks.

Not really. If anything, it sounds more like a clothing brand. Now that we've cleared that up, perhaps you'd like to contribute something useful.

Bully for her. Holloway, yes, UrbEx is technically illegal. But some of the explorers I've met with a greater wealth of experience than myself assure me that you're only likley to face charges if you trespass on sites that contain elements that pose a risk to the intruders or any staff if disturbed (or could inconvenience those living nearby), such as power stations, abandoned tube stations, MoD property etc. Other than that, you aren't likely to find yourself before the beak if you poke around a disused warehouse. But the getting 'caught' aspect is all part of the thrill of UrbEx.

What a shame. Anyway, besides cottaging, does anyone have any good recommendations? Or any experiences they'd like to share? I'm fairly new to the scene myself.

Keep your fantasies to yourself, please.

Anyone do this? We've done Severalls Hospital, Claybury Asylum and a few other less interesting locations. If there's any other explorers on here please email me any recommendations. Though we prefer active sites.

Huguenot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You want us to name and provide address details > for journalists in South East London so you can > publicly humiliate them? Isn't that what a lot of so-called journalists do for a living, regardless of their politics?

At a reported 31,000sqft, I'm guessing this new arrival's intended to attract shoppers from Greenwich, as opposed to lower income council tenants, of which Deptford is notorious for.

There's nothing more cringeworthy than middle class people sticking it to "da man" through the medium of reggae.

I read somewhere that an area can only be classified as 'hip' once the postmen are delivering in skinny jeans.