Renata Hamvas Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Dear all is it the avenue of poplars? See email > below or other trees (horse chestnuts are > mentioned above). The poplars are being removed > due to disease/safety reasons. I had a surgery at > ED Community Centre on Saturday, the next Peckham > Rye one isn't until 27th June, so please pm me or > email me about this, > Renata > > Dear Councillors Edwards, Hamvas and Mills. > I am writing to advise you of necessary works to > an avenue of poplars in Camberwell New Cemetery. > The Poplar trees in question have been surveyed by > an external consultant as part of the strategy > target for surveying all of our parks trees. > Unfortunately the poplar trees in question were > found to be in a poor condition that represented a > high risk to the users of the cemetery and the > park. > > The decision to remove these trees was not taken > lightly and we fully appreciate the impact such a > large number of trees can have when they are > felled all together. The issues here are that a > large number of the lower trunks are decayed. This > means that there is little or no internal wood to > support the weight of the tree canopies. The wood > would have been decayed by a fungal pathogen > leaving it in a pulpy condition over a number of > years. > > The reason for removing all of the trees is due to > fact that once we start to remove the heavily > decayed ones we expose the others to wind loading > that they would not have been used to and their > rooting systems will not be as wind firm. This > means they are highly susceptible to wind throw > and could fail at any point. > > It is very difficult to quantify how long a > decayed tree or a tree susceptible to wind throw > could stand for and unfortunately because of that > reason we are not in a position to retain them. > > The altered state of the wood due to the fungi > means that there is no treatment available to > reverse the process of wood decaying fungi. > > Because we recognise the impact this will have, we > have already identified a planting scheme to > replace these trees. This will consist of native > mixed species to reduce the future risk of > pathogen attack by having a mono culture avenue. > > We intend to under plant with woodland flora to > create an additional interest. > > I would like to stress that this decision is one > that is taken with regret. > Kind regards. - - - - - - - - - That 'answer' leaves (no pun intended), a lot of queries: If the trees can't support the weight of the 'canopy', their poplars don't forget, how did the trees manage to support the weight of a butcher wielding a chainsaw? What is the name of the fungus? Just because some trees are removed nearby what evidence is there that says other trees now won't be able to withstand new wind loading? If the un-named fungus is so deadly and rife, one would presume that all remnants of the trees have been removed and not left to decay on the ground?