lbullen

Constructive criticism?

Dear Tim, I was not aware of anyprofessional arboricultural use of Murphy Mortagg, and the answer is simple. There isn't one. You are right it is a withdrawn product and was designed to treat aphid eggs on fruit trees, it has no effect on Horse Chestnut Leaf Miner (which has been downgraded to a cosmetic disorder, along with the leaf blight). It would not have been sprayed which is done when the tree is in full leaf as it is a Wash. Advice is merely to attempt to prevent the continuation of the life cycle of the beetle (Camerera ohridella) by collecting and disposing (burning) of all leaf material each Autumn/Winter. In respect of this I think you have a very good case of Fraud and of Negligence by Crossings. Speak soon, Liam Bullen NEUleaf

Dear Tim,I heard about the work conducted by Crosings at you property from Ed at Arborisics I understand that Crossings cut out theoccluded wounds on your tree, highly inadvisable and hen were contemplating spraying the stem? It is certainly a cowboy who knows nothing of treepathology or british standards for Treework. You should gt in touch with both the Arboricultural Association and BBC rogue traders. If you are instigating legal action. I would be happy to provide an arboricultural report at no cost. We need to ensure standards in the industry and protect other residents from Crossings. Kind regards, Liam Bullen Lead Surveyor and Managing Diector NEuleaf