What a really depressing post that is, letting the rail companies reduce the service by a third without so much as a whimper. How anyone can stand up for the travesty that is Southern Rail I have no idea. Putting on ONE extra train a day does not make up for this reduction in service nor their continuing lack of respect for their paying customers. Strawbs Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > From peckhamboy on the other thread re the trains > > At the risk of striking a rational and balanced > note amongst the fury, what is the real impact? > - Off-peak trains from ED to London bridge will > run every 15 mins instead of every 10. I > appreciate that might be annoying for some, but it > doesn't strike me as a huge issue. > - No connection from ED to East croydon for the > Gatwick train. As far as I could tell, this train > was only every half hour anyway - it was almost > quicker to go to LB and get the direct train from > there. There is an alternative train from Forest > Hill which isn't that far away (may even be closer > for a lot of people). > > And nobody seems to have pointed out that we seem > to be getting an additional train in the evening > at 2003, which I personally am delighted about. > 1949 always seemed far too early to switch from 6 > trains an hour to 2 (as evidenced by the fact that > the 2019 is invariably standing room only). It > will still go down to 2 an hour after 2019, but > it's a start. > > Personally, I'll be using the new 2003 much more > than I ever used the E Croydon train, so maybe I'm > biased, but overall I don't think there's too much > to get stoked up about. And given the number of > people who said they'd like to attend the meeting > but wouldn't be home in time, I'm guessing that > might be the position of quite a large number of > ED residents if they were given all the details > rather than just the ones the OP wanted to get > people worked up about. > > http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5 > ,188478