saleem

Perhaps you could go fist yourself, Inkmaiden?

giggirl Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hello Saleem, > > Subjecting an entire post code to these > outpourings is not the way to go. Seriously. > Some people have suggested it's boring. They're > wrong. It's car crash. > > Please try and find a possibility for yourself > that you're living a life that impacts others in a > positive way and that fulfills you. This thing > that you're doing is not big, or clever, it's > screaming empty. Stop it. Hugenot has upset you. > Fine. I get it. Try and be bigger than your > enemies, not smaller. > > GG Save your hippie talk for the Kumbaya brigade.

All you should take from this thread, Mick, is evidence of how liberals are conditioned to avoid uncomfortable truths with irrelevant accusations.

That's a rather hypocritical claim to make for someone who chose to resort to immature circle-jerking after it dawned on them that they couldn't refute uncomfortable truths by any means other than running petty distraction. Typical of your average liberal entitlement case. I bet you camped-out in front of St. Paul's in solidarity with all the other Occupy cretins.

Grammatical fail. If you were addressing me, "thread" would've immediately been followed by a comma, dummy.

It's hardly fair to lay the blame for Huguenot's cowardice on France's doorstep. Otherwise we'd have to pursue them for his dishonesty, too.

Otta Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > "Son"? > > Are you actually an American drill sergeant? No. Are you actually trying to be funny?

Yes, engineered by liberals. But do his opinions make him a Nazi?

Son, you levelled irrelevant, unfounded accusations of me being a Nazi because you couldn't defend the ideals you hold dear against my critique. Also, I noticed you dodged answering my question re. the YT video. Seriously, could you fail any harder than you are now?

Huguenot, can this guy be accused of being a Nazi on account of the views he expresses? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdxQbBk4huA&list=UU1g1imYIlcjt47kuHjlBzZA&index=4&feature=plcp

Who said anything about genetics? Or are you just running further distraction?

Huh?

Livingstone shouldn't have allowed himself into giving that reporter the response he appeared to be looking for. Other than that, you're awkwardly unfunny.

Have you ever called someone you're losing an argument to a Nazi (online or otherwise) because you or idealogy you claim allegiance to have been intellectually intimidated into a corner with no way out, other than irrelevant accusations to distract attention away from your immediate or impending defeat? A user called Huguenot did exactly that to me in the Obama thread. Even though the Third Reich, Hitler or the Nazis couldn't be furthered removed from the discussion at hand. Seems like he had no other choice under the circumstances. Still, it's a cowardly and pathetic direction to take. Especially if it's unfounded. I feel sorry for anyone who has to resort to such irrelevant and/or unfounded accusation.

Which you've so-far refused to disclose...