dank4000 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Just reading the rest of this thread... > > Why does everyone seem to want the status quo of > traffic and pollution everywhere? I don?t get it. I doubt anybody wants the current status quo. I?m sure most people are desperate to see pollution levels reduce. However, closing local streets is not the solution. Even if this does have the desired effect of reducing overall levels of traffic it will without a doubt lead to increased traffic on the roads described rather outrageously in the councils original consultation documents as the main arterial roads. These roads - LL, EDG etc are residential streets just like other streets in the area. In fact some areas of these streets are more densely populated, with houses closer to the road, than some of the streets that have been recommended for road closures (eg townley road). As some people have already said on here, it is absolutely not acceptable to allow measures that make life better for some but are to the detriment of others. Also, many of the schools in the local area were not shown in the original OHSD map e.g village infants, the junior school, east Dulwich Grove charter, JAGS prep, JAGS pre-prep, the primary school on LL (and that?s probably not all of them). These schools are all situated on - and in many cases are very close to - roads that will suffer from increased traffic due to displacement. It is not ok that children will sit in classrooms all day next to increased levels of traffic and therefore probably pollution, nor is it ok that children at these schools will have to walk along streets with increased traffic to get there. I would like to see all talk of road closures dropped. We have to look at other measures to reduce pollution that affect everyone equally like improving public transport (difficult right now of course), finding a way to make escooters safe, greater incentives to use electric vehicles etc etc.