fabfor

Yes, otta, I will be flying back to complete my annual 12,000 mile round trip! And Furthermore I'll be enjoying it too because I love flying and aircraft. BUT I regard loud, sleep-disturbing noise at night as a (proven) health hazard which is why I'm against night flights (as any sane person should be)! Anyhow, wrong thread!!!

I'm also away at present but will try to find details of the "fine/charge" when I return next month. Thanks again, Erroll.

Reminds me of the old joke: just because you're paranoid it doesn't mean they're not out to get you! Btw, they imposed a "fine" of ?90.00 on me a few years ago when I was disputing their charges; no legal notices etc., just a fine after threats. Any chance of recovering that?

A lack of storage space inspired this 'foldaway' table last year for my nieces.

Terrifying but informative. Thank you very much, Erroll.

Heathrow didn't know flightpaths had changed! Unbelievable. http://hacan.org.uk/heathrow-airport-furious-nats-didnt-tell-them-about-critical-flight-path-changes/

This is a link to research into the effect of night flights on the body. It's in French but shows that damage is done whether or not you're consciously aware of the flights.

Indeed, James. I find his argument and the evidence used pretty convincing.

Have we been conned? :http://politics.co.uk/comment-analysis/2014/11/12/comment-how-we-ve-been-conned-into-believing-the-uk-has-an-a

Have we been conned? :http://politics.co.uk/comment-analysis/2014/11/12/comment-how-we-ve-been-conned-into-believing-the-uk-has-an-a

Man★Van★Insured★Reliable★Recommended here:http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?30,880990,1355845#msg-1355845 Frank 07956 650744.

Hacan blog about impact of third runway. Same figures, different interpretations:http://hacan.org.uk/blog/?p=310

Some good news (at last) from Hacan: http://hacan.org.uk/blog/?p=300 Come what may, it looks like this and many other areas distant from Heathrow will be noise free. Hallelujah!

Pound shop?

Welcome back, fazer.😊

The "no ifs no buts" campaign needs your help here: https://www.thunderclap.it/en/projects/12648-no-ifs-no-buts

Anyhow, on the more important subject of whether there is more to this world than meets the eye, examples 1 and 3 in the link above demonstrate beyond reasonable doubt that "mind over matter" is scientific fact. As pioneering physicist Sir James Jeans wrote: ?The stream of knowledge is heading toward a non-mechanical reality; the universe begins to look more like a great thought than like a great machine. Mind no longer appears to be an accidental intruder into the realm of matter, we ought rather hail it as the creator and governor of the realm of matter. Get over it, and accept the inarguable conclusion. The universe is immaterial-mental and spiritual.? (R.C. Henry, ?The Mental Universe? ; Nature 436:29,2005) (source)

Seen.

@root. The vitriol I'll leave with you but I'll take awesome every time. I thank you for that.

And anyhow, I don't like the messenger either;but the message is quite clear.

And what does the fact that there are more than 10 (as stated) indicate about your scientific curiosity, EP?

How about an Awards Picnic in the Park? A transition from virtual(ish)to real community...

Just for the record, not one but 10+ scientific studies that prove consciousness can alter our material world: http://www.collective-evolution.com/2014/03/08/10-scientific-studies-that-prove-consciousness-can-alter-our-physical-material-world/ I find the first one particularly shocking.

Which reminds me: Restraint in the use of the Asterisked Expletive - F*O. (Failed Outstandingly).

Help-Ma-Boab Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Pixie_Jem for this recent thread in the General > section. This one could have legs: > > http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5 > ,1310331 NJ New category: Thread With Most Legs.