Zombiemonkey

PRROA meeting confirmed 31st Saturday week 1000am clock house pub

The survey: ok, we all tried to do our bit, by filling it in even though it?s not fit for purpose, just so that we don?t end up under- represented. I?ve done this myself! Instead, what we should do, is email Southwark parks on: [email protected] and request a copy of their data under the freedom of information act, for them to explain: ?Unfortunately incidents relating to dogs have been increasing, and we want to address this ?. We should all explain that we are unable to fill the survey unless we have the data to hand to support our views, and respond to the survey in an informed manner. There is no evidence that incidents have increased as far as I know- quite the opposite, as having been a dog owner in this area for the past 14 years, I have noticed a huge improvement regarding dog related issues myself! Hope this helps, Zombiemonkey

Hi guys, was given this leaflet this morning, (attached), the email address is [email protected], apparently Nick is organising a meeting at the clock house next weekend. I saw the offending surveys on a table of Rye Hill Park's office. Also saw posters in the display boards. A lot of people were talking about this survey this morning. Oh, and I picked someone else's dog poo there BTW, was right on the paths by the floower beds. People who leave dog mess behing are not helping our cause... P.S. just realised my previous posts don't make sense, as when you reply to someone's message your post go right at the bottom of the thread...apologies for that, it's only my second time using this forum- duh!!

@ Lexathon:well, I'm curious, how doyou manage to avoid using the cycling boxes? Do you ride outside rush hours? I like your idea of having a spot for motorbikes in front of cars, but that would be impossible to put in place. So why not using the boxes already there and make them for all 2 wheels users? The ASLs are already used by cyclists and motorcyclists. We seem to have a mutual understanding, cyclists pile on the left, motorbikes and scooters on the right, we drive off out of everyone?s way and we keep ourselves safe. This works perfectly well. Well, I do come across ?militant cyclists? moaning at me ?but these occurrences are very rare. Cyclists usually don?t mind me being in front of 3 tons cars side by side with them as a general rule.

@ ironjawcannon: when we get trained to ride a motorbike, we are taught about riding safely and we are taught to overtake traffic. That's the whole point, it keeps us safe. If you are in a queue with cars, you get pushed out of the way, guaranteed that happens to me every day. And we need to be in front of all the cars to speed out of the way at traffic lights, again, to keep ourselves safe. And what is the problem with that? Bikes have faster acceleration then cars, so we?re not causing any nuisance to car drivers. And we are alert, car drivers aren't. They tend to go on auto- pilot when stuck in traffic jams (well, I don't as I ride both bikes and bicycles, so used to look out for all road users).

Hi Applespider, you just reminded of another (minor) argument in favour of motorcyclists legitimately using cycling boxes: being stuck behind cars is awful as you breathe all the exhaust fumes. At least when you are waiting in front of all the traffic, that doesn?t happen. Why should we be pushed back and forced to breathe that? It can't be good for you... @ PeckhamRose: fair point about differences between boroughs. Same problem about the bus lanes, 10 years ago I could use all of them- that was safe. Then they changed it to none of them. I bet that caused a few accidents ?Now this: you have to find the road signs, and read them as you are riding, whilst avoiding cyclists, cars, cabs, buses, and pedestrians running across roads outside zebra crossings. It?s quite scary, especially in the winter when it?s dark. If I'm reading the article in the standard though, those new cycling box fines will be across London and they are going to use CCTV to enforce it. It's just a money making scam really. Police until now were too busy to worry about motorcyclists using cycling boxes, who are causing no trouble at all, but now, well.. it's all a big grey area. As always for us. About motorcyclist frightening cyclists in bus lanes: we make noise, that's the point of having an engine, they can hear us coming. I can't hear cyclists coming, and they ride fast sometimes, cutting me off, wobbling, changing lanes suddenly. And a lot of them are a real danger: cycling in full length skirts and platform shoes, listening to music and crossing at zebras without looking...they are a lot of cyclists out there with no training and no idea about what they are doing. They are the ones I have to look out for.

Cat, living outside as you are allergic (cats don't mind...), or a Jack Russell, rats will never come near your home again- garanteed. And it's eco- friendly!

some interesting views on this blog: http://ukgser.com/forums/showthread.php?t=339619

Hey guys, why don't we meet to discuss these? The Ivy house is meant to re- open soon, we could kill 2 birds with one stone, make the most of the community pub, and come up with a plan of action to protect our right to using public parks? Just an idea here....

Am I the only person here who thinks it?s about time that ?cycling boxes? or ASLs should officially made available to motorcyclists? We hear all about cyclists? safety, all of the time, and hear all about motorists views too, but I find that in London, nobody ever talks about motorcyclists. Now, I won?t even start on the (money making) business of bus lanes? but right now, it?s all about this law enforcement update. From today, you can get a ?100 fine and 3 POINTS ON YOUR DRIVING LICENSE (hence insurance fees going up?) for using cycling boxes in London. As usual, not a single mention of motorcyclists in the debate. Our safety is put at risk here. What are your thoughts about it? http://www.standard.co.uk/news/transport/60-fines-and-cctv-crackdown-on-drivers-who-stop-in-bike-boxes-at-traffic-lights-8635559.html

Nicely said

Yes sure! Great idea! Let?s have a ?law? to muzzle all pet dogs. Then foxes, badgers, squirrels, rats, mice, cats as well, why not? Then what next? Delinquents, alcoholics, drug addicts, homeless people?. Let?s keep going!

By "increased issues", do you mean witnessing dog owners being bullied? Because yes, I have plenty examples of that, gathered over the years. As I said in my later post, I have been verbally, physically abused, been threatened, been spat at, had my dogs kicked, had a glass bottle waved in my face by the dad of a child playing football on a Sunday (in front of his kids), etc... etc... Lost count over the past 10 years I've had the "audacity" to have dogs. Not to mention the number of times I was left to take care of complete strangers? children in pubs, as they let them "stroke the cute puppies" and dumping them with me to deal with, too paralytic to look after their own kids...But that's ok, I guess! Except that if my dogs even growled at them in impatience, they could have faced being "put to sleep".

It's a real shame that there is such prejudice against dog owners. We currently live in a homocentric world and let's face it, it's not working well is it?

Nicely said, totally agree!