healey

Find out for yourself? edhistory Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > So, when was the first "side return" extension, > the subject of this thread, done that destroyed > the side garden/yard and probaby the back addition > ground floor bay window? > > Just an East Dulwich street name and approximate > date will be fine. > > John K

Side return extensions on these houses are very common and as long as you have a party wall agreement and only extend to the original depth of your house there should be few problems with planning or neighbours. If you are hoping to extend beyond the original depth of your house then prepare for a possible fight. As LondonMix said, planning laws are being slightly relaxed, but the new rules still allow neighbours to object. If your extension hems in someone's garden they almost certainly will object. I'm not a fan of the new planning rules as they will undoubtedly cause fights.

UncleBen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > It'll be graffited over in 5 mins. They wouldn't get very far without a cherry picker.

Louisa Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Will this thread ever just pee off? > > It's always being rehashed with some corny half > baked story. > > They're not interested in bloody ED, its never > gonna open here, get over it! > > Louisa. Aren't you the same Louisa who posted a number of comments in this thread recently?

Ditch Dreamweaver and code in a text editor like Notepad++. It's easier to get into than you think, and you'd make far more efficient pages... Failing that at a pinch I'd try uninstalling DW4, or perhaps both then reinstalling only DW6. That might hopefully clean out any file assocations.

I bought the iPad 1 in 2010 to surf the web with. I've used it every day since then. It's a useful tool for me. I'm happy for other people not to buy them if they so choose.

You could park in the bike bay on platform 1 of the train station. It has what look like timelapse cameras next to it, which is some comfort.

JDR Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Anyway, just heard that the councils plans were > discussed this afternoon and a few locals attended > with feedback. The councils plan appeared to be > showing them clearing all of the land for vacant > possession but this will not be happening. There > has been some community protection agreed for > local enterprises.... > Relayed from Peckham Visions Facebook page ( look > yourself for full detail as I can't cut and paste > on this device...) Does this mean they'll struggle to clear out the old square? If so then that's a shot-sighted disaster. Sorry to sound hard-hearted to anyone affected but the building in the square is a mess and needs removing.

It's a good scheme. The buildings in the old square are a mess. LameDuck: "They regenerated Deptford train station last year pulled down the front elevation." They will be clearing some 1930s buildings out of the old square. The station itself will be restored to its former glory.

It strikes me that if the likes of M&S are serious about this site they would do well to make a tempting offer to the hand car wash. It gets in the way of redevelopment and causes its own traffic problems, I would have thought.

Otta Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Good for them, I had no idea that was there. May > go and have a chat, see whether they do amp > repairs. They do indeed. Took my 70s Quad amp down there for a repair and fixed it at a reasonable cost. Chap who did it was very helpful.

Japan. Three weeks.

youandiaredominoes Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > We don't need this extension. It's nice being cut > off from the tube - that's why some of us live > round these parts! It's never going to come anywhere near East Dulwich proper, but it should certainly include a key town such as Camberwell.

So the Burgess Park route that completly bypasses Camberwell currently has favour? Seems a complete waste of time to me. A Burgess Park stop is great for the residents there of course but it's not serving a notable town. I think Camberwell has to be included to make this fly, otherwise it'll be little different to a commuter belt train.

As others have said, Underhill Road opposite Honor Oak Mansions almost certainly. The slightly sunken roof detailing next to the chimney (if it's still there) and the shape of step up to the next house could identify the right house, but Google maps isn't really great for such fine comparisons!

CP road is a car park, so I'm not sure you'd ever see your blue cycling lane unless there were parking restrictions. Putting parking restrictions along its entire length would cause a riot! Do they ever put the lanes on the outside of parking areas? karter Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > James is talking sense at last, put a speed sensor > or camera on Lordship lane instead of filling it > with crossings so that he can get his kids across > the street in one piece. Also, a blue cycle route > from the Plough and down Crystal Palace rd through > Bellenden and Peckham and avoiding the hill and > into town makes sense. Another no brainer. Voter > Karter please.

> It's decline arose from people 'Like Myself' > staying away because the area became unsafe at > night. Die to poor lighting amd general neglect from the authorities. Yet now the area is attracting money and investment you oddly choose to pour scorn on those who help bring it.

swissjoel Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > East Dulwich is a DULL place to live. No soul, too > many prams and white (upper) middle class > wannabes. You're sixteen years old and your parents have grounded you. No Shoreditch this weekend!

On exactly what grounds was this rejected?

A private message would be more appropriate. Somethimes things don't go to plan.

So what do you want people to do exactly? Form a lynch mob? Burn him at the stake? He'll now be on the sexual offenses register. Even if he did time he'd be out in less than a year.

I've never had any problems, but I try to avoid any of the busy times. Changing rooms seem clean enough and showers fine. The pool itself is very nice. I've been to far worse places for a swim, that's for sure.

You can also see how Sydhenham could be made to fit. Obviously the older map wasn't hugely accurate.

Thanks for this! Love old maps....

Seriously?? The "stik" figures are a lovely bit of graphic design. The mural above was downright ugly. It wasn't even finished if that photo is anything to go by. DavidPeckham Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > It's still a lot better than those stick chaps off > Lordship lane!