But it didn't expire - there was a bill to grant copyright in perpetuity (more or less). Wiki link here I don't think that anyone objects to King's trying to raise money through charitable donation, just the manner in which a group of people, myself included, have been targeted. I still have mixed feelings about it, though am not overly bothered. I can see why it might upset some people though. I think it?s better than the ?charity muggers? though, whom I personally loathe. I would never sign up to anything that anyone approached me on the street about, as a matter of principle. I guess that they work though, as the charities continue to use them. I wonder if there is an approach that people might find more appropriate for King?s to use? (And it might make for a slightly more constructive discussion!) I wondered about the handing out of leaflets about the charity?s work when someone goes in for an outpatients appointment, with a form on the leaflet to register your interest if you are. It would have the same effect in terms of targeting the hospital?s users, but without using any form of personal data or contacting potentially vulnerable people in their own homes, and it would save on postage. The only downside from the hospital?s point of view is that you may only be able to target outpatients effectively, as inpatients might not be in a fit state to receive the information and act on it, depending on how ill they are, and it probably isn?t fair to ask staff to make a judgement as to whether to pass the leaflet on. Unless there is some sort of information pack that patients are given on discharge about their future care and it could be included in that (I have no idea, as haven?t been in hospital as an inpatient since I was a child). Any other ideas?