Jump to content

ab29

Member
  • Posts

    594
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. "Not many people live in the imediate area" - eh?? Me! "Been polluted for decades" - so we do what - we should die and stop being a problem?
  2. Sorry Jazzer, not a Q for me but I would plant lots and lots of trees and turn it into green space - no dogs - just nature, as much as possible on an A road 🙂
  3. I would turn it into a green space. Having Dulwich Park nearby is not an excuse. Why should residents of Dulwich Village, having Dulwich Junction closed, turned into "piazza" and refurbished multiple times (no end to this btw cause Southwark council apparently has millions to waste) use it as an excuse? People living in the area have to put up with a very high level of: - Air pollution - Noise - Anti social behaviour How about transferring the skate park from the Grove Tavern parking lot to Dulwich Village? Kind of idea how to sort the derelict Tavern 🙂
  4. Campaign Update | 24 Feb West Dulwich Action Group High Court hearing West Dulwich Action Group’s legal case against Lambeth for imposing an LTN has been heard in the High Court. The hearing was widely reported in the national press, including the Standard. It is likely to be a few weeks before the judge delivers his verdict. New review highlights scale of opposition to LTNs A review of 90 LTNs across 17 London boroughs and six other UK cities has found that the overwhelming majority were brought in without community support. Of the 78 LTNs that were subject to public consultations, 86% had sizeable majorities of respondents opposed. Despite this, three out of four LTNs were imposed anyway. The review, based on councils’ own published results, was carried out on behalf of a coalition of more than 15 local campaign groups by One Dulwich, who are quoted in last Saturday’s Times. The article highlights the extent to which councils manipulated survey questions and results to disguise the scale of opposition. Safety at the Dulwich Village junction One Dulwich has written to Southwark Council expressing major concerns about safety at the re-designed junction, urging the Council to install better signage and road markings, and to improve crossing points. Because of the risk of serious accidents, we have asked for the Council to respond as a matter of urgency. Thank you for your support. Best wishes, The One Dulwich Team
  5. "As usual we, the idiots paying for this, can go hang! And look forward to the endless jams polluting our atmosphere." just wait for pro ltn crowd to suffocate you. Oh wait 🤔
  6. "random Friday afternoon decision made out of the blue" - no, it is money - as it alway is - who cares about people?
  7. Done a lot. It get worst and worst am afraid. Lime and other ebike companies dump their bikes anywhere they want It looks like as the supply overtake the demand 🤔 "they're very quick to respond" - meaning what exactly? Moving ebike from location A to location B?
  8. "No chance of the 40 route being changed back now, I'm sure." - but why? The decision to redirect it was wrong
  9. Bus number 40 used to to go go London Bridge. Cut by TFL no one knows why - redirected to Clerkenwell where no one ever goes to - misterious. Residents of SE22 started a petition and protested to no avail - who cares? @Andy Simmons I contacted you about bus no 40 ages ago - any updates?
  10. Spurling Rd near Goose Green
  11. And at the same time nothing is done for pedestrians which should be a priority
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...