alice

National insurance for landlords? I’d say over half of them are past retirement age

Well, I do stand by my point that sometimes academies can be seen to spend money that does not directly impact the education of children., removing trees or bushes is one such thing. Maybe they intend to replace them with something far superior but this is all money that could be spent elsewhere that actually benefits learning. edit: of course if they have been removed because they contain poisonous berries that may result in the death of a child I bow my head and apologise.

That’s what academies do spend money on things that do not directly relate to the education of the children. In fact, in this case, I think it would be detrimental - don’t plants reduce CO2 and a school on a busy road needs to maximise that benefit not reduce it

The only children that would be crossing there would be accompanied by teaching / support staff. But no, it’s a very non-busy road because of current Southwark restrictions and as all children would be over 11 I don’t consider them vulnerable.

That’s making me cry. So much for prioritising the vulnerable.

Isnt it connected to the Prince of Peckham?

Now isn’t that land going to be built on for student housing or have I got it wrong? Maybe it’s prep? PS plenty of benches in Dulwich Village and Melbourne Grove if you’re searching for somewhere to sit.

Fabulous news I hope the court had the power to order you compensation

I wonder why they didn’t use Fairfield Halls with 10 times the space

When I lived in San Francisco, it wasn’t flat.

That’s quite an unpleasant accusation.

Every single time I cross at lights, I have to slow down and look down the left side of the bus or the car or the truck to see if a cyclist is shooting up there.

There’s no record on southwark for planning permission for anything for that building. But something will happen and that’s my prediction. It’s a waste of space at the moment big old pubs like that aren’t working anymore. They’re closing down all over the place. A shop on the ground floor, a mini Lidl perhaps and then flats above built in the style of the adjoining flats. Social housing would be the preference but DE will go for the money.

It’s going to be pulled down 100%.

It’s absolutely the right place. It would’ve been placed in the drawing room, but that room has been demolished so the lounge is perfect.

❤️ yes congratulations and ps its cash only on return.

If it’s housing, there’s good reasons to wait for the bailiffs. But with a business, I can’t think of one.

It’s £5 for an hour.

In May Trump was saying that crime has substantially reduced in DC and how proud he was of the achievement now he’s calling in the National Guard because crime now is out of hand nothing has changed. It’s exactly like this thread. No, I don’t have to read it but it’s beyond boring and now has become totally Trumpian.

Children sticking their tongue out at adults is age old silly behaviour.

Perhaps OP would wish to find out why the tree was considered dangerous?

No one on here is likely to know are they? better approach Southwark Council for a sensible response and then maybe post it here?

They did change it to ‘ Consignia’ it cost millions of pounds and then they binned it.

Some surveyors / damp specialists are linked to companies that do the remedial work. avoid - these people have one solution which they apply to every damp problem irrespective of its cause. After wasting a lot of money on a big company damp specialist with a useless guarantee I found independentspecialistsurveys.co.uk - His comprehensive report covered everything from gutters to location of furniture and size of ventilators. I would totally recommend him.