first mate

I also hope nobody was hurt. Awful for the homeowners and must have given them a fright, not to mention having to pay for a new brick wall. Is there any information on the date this happened and circumstances?

LCC and its various off shoots does present as a sort of community, working to shared aims, with lots of advisories/scripts for its members to use to achieve those aims.

I don't think you can really describe the Dulwich Society transport sub-committee, chaired by an award winning LCC activist of the year, as truly apolitical? Weren't a number of those committee sessions also attended and supported by incumbent Labour Councillors?

Glad you got sorted. Meantime, hoping for an update from someone on what happened at the GALA consultation meeting with local residents, a few days ago. Especially interested in thinking on their proposed event extension and footprint.

The vehicles shown in the photo above are bikes that are powered. It is hard to tell, just from the photos, how fast each bike can go. Glad we can agree that most would not refer to them as "mopeds".

I have no information on that. I'd imagine GALA would be happy to advise you direct. I am interested to know what happened at the consultation meeting a few days ago and am hoping that someone from FOPRP can share. The concern is that it is proposed to extend the event footprint and timeframe. If successful, this could set precedent for further extensions and for other events organisers to bid for slots throughout summer, in a scenario similar to what has happened at Brockwell Park. This is not a flight of fancy, Cllr Catherine Rose has stated intention to monetise parkland.

Yes, but wondering why the picture that is the reason for this particular thread has been removed? Just to add, Malumbu has posted before about incidents he has had with pedestrians when he was out cycling, caused, he said, by them not looking where they were going.

Did anyone manage to get to this? What was the feedback?

Why has M64 removed the picture to the alleged incident?

Thanks for the confirmation and good to know this tree is going to be preserved. It is very beautiful. Thank you also to those of you who intervened on the ground and with the Council and thank goodness for FOPR!

I hope that for the sake of anyone riding or cycling in the dark, this area is very well marked and cordoned off. I have known a number of cyclists suffer extremely nasty injuries as a result of holes and cracks in the road.

Check out some of the truly huge and heavy vehicles trundling up and down that area to the Charter build. But we are not going to ban them are we? So in terms of focussing on biggest and heaviest I am not quite sure what your point is? That is very true. I am as against reckless driving as anyone on here, but plonking a picture onto social media with assumptions rather than facts, to make a point just looks silly.

No type of vehicle should drive or ride on the pavement, it is obviously potentially dangerous.

If a car or other travelling at speed, someone local would have heard quite a bang? Maybe a large lorry or similar, misjudging space? A much larger vehicle probably would not need to go fast at all in order to dislodge it and there would be no collision noise? Lots of very large vehicles involved with building work at Charter.

Suggest all eyes kept on this tree until Gala event completely over this year. Also monitor for further branch lopping. If they keep hacking off branches, it will get diseased. It is entirely possible this tree could 'accidently' get cut down because of a mixup. In those pictures, if recent, the tree does not look diseased at all. Not sure location of tree in relation to new proposed increased Gala event footprint? Does it get in the way of proposed track, or something?

My view is try to get police to do some sessions at known hotspots but include cyclists, who often do not stop at the zebra either. More enforcement for careless and reckless road use needed all round.

It is interesting that it is the same tree Gala 'reduced' because I believe it interfered with their perimeter fencing. Gala are proposing an increased footprint and extended event, this year. Is this tree possibly in the way?

Yes, so long as pedestrians are mingling and mounted cyclists are, well, staying in their lane. Saw a female cyclist pelt across the pedstrianised area on her bike. I caught her eye and she looked sheepish, just for a moment.

Do One Dulwich provide guides on how members of its affiliated groups living in other boroughs can contribute to and affect consultation results on road design and traffic management at local level? Does it provide detailed guidelines on how to harness social media at local level to get the 'right' messaging out and quash dissenting voices. Does it advise how to lobby councillors and takeover/ 'invade' lical groups with political clout? Maybe it already does, if not, perhaps it should, just to balance things.

Including all the fair weather cyclists, so it will be interesting to see if careless cycling increases or people start to be more careful. There will also be more pedestrians as the weather improves, so let's hope cyclists stick to the cycling areas.

I cannot stand speeding drivers and I am pleased to say I have a clean record on that score. I am diligent about observing 20mph and not only in town. I would not dream of jumping a red light, whether in a car or on a bicycle. I don't know if I have just been unusually lucky or perhaps it is because I have never been a speed freak, but I have had near misses both with other motorists and with other cyclists, the latter outweighing the former by some margin- which is surprising I know, but that is my experience. I have had no issues with pedestrians and no near misses with pedestrians when cycling, but there again, I do not cycle fast.

Ah, not really, since Vanity Square has become something of a badly behaved cyclist hotspot, where jumping the red lights is de rigeur, even with your kids on a cargo bike and some cyclists zip through at quite a crack, whizzing across the pedestrian square as a shortcut. I was simply pointing out that getting 20mph set to include all road users does not seem to be the huge, complex and impossible task some of you have painted it. Enforcement, a bit trickier but not impossible either.

Okay, so speed, weight and size of cars is the main issue? I did not say it was unreasonable to want cars to adhere to 20mph at all; I would be very happy for that to happen, so that is a shared aim, only I want all road users included, not just some. As to weight and size, I also agree, I do not see the need for enormous vehicles in town, but if made to adhere to 20mph by speed limiters and seriously penalised for any breaches, I guess I could live with larger cars, given speed as a major driver re safety, has been addressed. Where we differ is the whole widening paths, greening streets approach, if 20 mph is adhered to, penalties are increased for breaches surely that is the main thing? I also think that if you are going to push for rafts of measures to make life as difficult for car drivers, should you be leading by example and sacrificing your own car use, however occasional?

Clearly you do not or choose not to read what others post, so you can deflect and perpetuate your accusation of manufactured culture wars. I said I would not have an issue with cars being fitted with speed limiters. I am sure you have done your homework, so please tell us how this would work in practice? What legislation, if any, would be required? Would cars have to be retrofitted with tech, how would this be done? What sort of timeframe and what costs? How might he geofencing aspect work? So, what else do you want? Come Malumbu, here is your chance to give us your vision. Of course, I assume you will no longer ever use a car? After all, from what some of you say we can and should all do without cars and simply rely on a combination of bicycle and public transport to get us anywhere, whether that be to see a relative, to visit a second home in France, or to go to hospital.

So really you want to squeeze and fine all but a few car owners and force them to use bicycles of some description. In terms of weight classes do all your preferred stipulations also apply to electric cars? I would not have an issue with speed limiters in town. On the basis that your main objection seems to be about car speed and potential for damage, given size/weight, if all/majority of cars could be speed limited in town to keep them within designated limits, is there a need for the other stipulations? Do you use cars...ever?