first mate

Yes, perhaps one or a handful of residents supported by pro CPZ campaigners from outside the area. My only point is that the ?interference? of outsiders charge cuts both ways.

Indeed, a final say like should the hours be time limited or all day but the fact that there will be CPZ at all is a result of all stages of consultation.

Not sure that is the case and if it was why would the extremely well informed SC urge members outside of borough consultation areas to get involved and submit?

Well, hitherto, consultations in favour of CPZ have been bulked out by cyclists well out of the area. Southwark cyclists and LCC actively encourage their members to participate in CPZ consultations much further afield.

Serena2012 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The petition asking Southwark to reverse the > closures in Dulwich Village and East Dulwich now > has over 500 signatures. Linking again > http://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/mgEPetitionDispl > ay.aspx?id=500000049 > > I?m with FairTgirl, in that school streets are to > be supported. Arguably, this should include > Melbourne South and Whateley Road (in the case of > Whateley, they could have a gate keeper similar to > Elsie Road, which would allow buses through). > However the closures in their current state are > not proportionate, and seem to benefit certain > streets, whilst causing significantly increased > levels of pollution on others. This is not > equitable, nor is it improving air quality. http://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/mgEPetitionDisplay.aspx?id=500000049 Now over 700 signatures.

dougiefreeman Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Online Southwark petition is now live > > http://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/mgEPetitionDispl > ay.aspx?id=500000049 206 now signed. It needs 500.

first mate Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > FairTgirl Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Hi, the petition is going very well, and there > is > > a new petition now live on Southwarks website > as > > well here; > > > > > http://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/mgEPetitionDispl > > > ay.aspx?id=500000049 > > > > I have also updated the original post as > Richard > > Livingstone is no longer in his post, > Councillor > > Catherine Rose is now in the role with a > > responsibility for Southwark roads. Also there > is > > a new cabinet role for Low Traffic Southwark, > and > > councillor responsible for that is Radha > Burgess. > > > > Please also email them to let them know your > > concerns about these road closures. > > [email protected] > > [email protected] Hi, cannot seem to get that link to work. Is it meant to go direct to petition?

Yes, the planters have had a major, negative impact on traffic on main routes and if this is now also hindering emergency services that is very worrying.

I think you know that is not what I was alluding to.

If they can and really want to they will. At the moment there are other things to consider. There has to be balance.

?

FairTgirl Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hi, the petition is going very well, and there is > a new petition now live on Southwarks website as > well here; > > http://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/mgEPetitionDispl > ay.aspx?id=500000049 > > I have also updated the original post as Richard > Livingstone is no longer in his post, Councillor > Catherine Rose is now in the role with a > responsibility for Southwark roads. Also there is > a new cabinet role for Low Traffic Southwark, and > councillor responsible for that is Radha Burgess. > > Please also email them to let them know your > concerns about these road closures. > [email protected] > [email protected]

Great. People who are able may well continue and more who are genuinely able to cycle everywhere may well start, however, for now, I am in favour of overturning street closures.

The ambulance is past the red light but still being held up.

82 now

54 already, think those numbers will be up in no time.

Than you!

500 signatures needed.

Here we go

?Are they really being that reckless in comparison? Seems there are so many other failings that you could direct your ire towards. If it came down to a choice of the two, I think I'd rather take my chances chatting in the skate park than picking up some asparagus in M&S or hopping on the 176 with the chin-warmer brigade?. What does chin-warmer brigade mean?

rahrahrah Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > would also make it super easy to get to Herne Hill > for Thameslink services. > > If people could hop on a hire bike and leave it at > the station, it may also have a positive impact on > car congestion along EDG Sadly, seems bike theft is on the rise and making all day parking at station secure enough possibly not realistic, also only limited space outside. People can use folders though and take them into work.

alice Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > What?s happened to the adventure playground? That?s a point. That is also quite a large area and, if not being used, might be a better space for noisier activities.

Why Rockets, they?re all cycling in from Kent now😉

I had suggested sessions of yoga, tai- chi, etc.. in summer? Quite a few people already go to this area to do this anyway so that could be developed for the community on a pay as you go basis? The ?club? house could be used for massage, physio and perhaps yoga in winter? Perhaps I am way off base but it just feels a natural fit and could benefit all ages.

Blah Blah Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The problem with tennis courts is that it limits > the number of people that can use the space at any > one time. Even if fully booked, it doesn't seem > like a good use of the space. Also, do we really > want the noise of tennis balls breaking through > the peace of the Japanese and Sexby Gardens? Completely agree. We all need areas of tranquillity, especially in urban areas, why destroy it?