peterstorm1985 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Just because something is 'designer' doesn't mean it > should be flimsy - Its funny you should say that because in her same email, the jeweller actually makes that very excuse! and yes, they knew it was for a wedding ring. Anyway, ClareC, if you could pm me the details of the chap in Hatton Garden, I'd really appreciate that. Unfortunately we cannot claim the ring under home insurance, and at the moment we are wondering whether to pursue this under the 'Fit For Purpose' route since the jeweller is so steadfast . But it's really a path we'd rather not go down.