whibel

BrandNewGuy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > whibel Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > There is a context to London's riots that can't > be > > ignored > > > http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/0 > > > 8/context-london-riots > > I call bullsh*t. 14-year-olds out on the streets > looting have spent all but one of those years > under a Labour government. Any responsibility > there? yeah. i get the picture. nice dropping in on your folks. goodbye east dulwich forum, enjoy your cupcakes, etc.

BrandNewGuy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > whibel Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > There is a context to London's riots that can't > be > > ignored > > > http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/0 > > > 8/context-london-riots > > I call bullsh*t. 14-year-olds out on the streets > looting have spent all but one of those years > under a Labour government. Any responsibility > there? yeah. i get the picture. nice dropping in on your folks. goodbye east dulwich forum, enjoy your cupcakes.

There is a context to London's riots that can't be ignored http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/08/context-london-riots

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/08/context-london-riots

Alex K Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > This sort of thing just pushes further and further > into the future any decision by Waitrose to open > on Lordship Lane. surely another contender for Post of the Year. brilliant.

thebestnameshavegone Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'm expecting Ocado literally any minute - does > anyone know if they've been able to get through > Rye Lane? ( just checking - you are being ironic? )