DaveR Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > > barts, why do you think that your child is less > likely to be happy if the school were a bit more > rigorous about raising standards of attainment? > That's the implication of your post, and I've > already alluded to the fact that this almost > subconscious attitude seems to be prevalent with > Goodrich. I was not implying that my child would be less happy if the school was more rigorous! What a bizarre deduction! I trust the teachers to do what they are paid to do. If I wasn't satisfied that my child was learning and progressing to the best of her ability then of course I would discuss this with the school. Just because we differ in outlook doesn't mean that either of us are wrong.If you perceive this to be a 'subconscious attitude' at Goodrich it isn't something I have noticed when conversing with other parents or staff. We're all entitled to our own opinions. As far as Academy Status goes, I agree that all of us need to do our own research and come to the next meeting better informed. It is true that you can federate with a school without becoming an academy incidentally, it's the financial implications that need to be made clearer so hopefully the private consultant's report will clarify that. Perhaps we should find out if other parents felt inhibited by the presence of teachers? I didn't and it was a lengthy meeting with no awkward silences but it could be suggested to the governors / senior team to canvas parental views. > >