In the 1st instance Hugue, the OG and I reached the same conclusion at the same time as I made the discovery. I was actually looking for a rational explanation as to why a banking had been recorded differently to what was actually banked and why might the cash that was supposed to have been banked, not have been. She reached the same conclusion as I did. However her fondness for the guy I think supercedes whatever she might think of his actions in this particular case. Look, the 'suspect' himself knows I know. I had to make an adjustment in the accounts which I highlighted to him in an email. If he couldn't read between the lines that the adjustment was made because of missing cash then he is more stupid than I think he is. My hesitation to 'report' this is down to my not knowing the right thing to do. I have a family to feed as well. A case of see no evil hear no evil may be better than unemployment. If they don't make my role permanent which is now looking less likely as circumstances have changed internally, I will probably tell the MD why he is making a mistake (because I am doing the job other people have neglected and making a big difference) and I may even imply all is not well in terms of accounting practices in his office IMO.