To any logical person it is blatantly obvious thing are not as they seem in the McCann case, on the night Madeleine disappeared the McCann?s went to bed, while the police and half the town and holiday makers where searching right through the night for her, The McCann?s were so distressed they had presents of mind to set up a so called fund With in days of Madeleine going missing, they went jogging and played tennis? It just doesn?t make sense, come on people if your daughter disappeared could you go jogging and play tennis? Cadaver scent detected in the McCann?s holiday apartment, in the hire car, car keys, on Kate?s clothes the sniffer dogs where used in the McCann?s friends holiday apartments and found nothing, until they go into the McCann?s apartment and the dog detects the Cadaver scent. Martin Grimes the dog handler said the dogs are 100% and never wrong Kate refusing to answer questions, McCann?s and friends refusing to go back to Portugal for a reconstruction, Plenty of substantial evidence against the McCann?s, not one shed of evidence to support abduction Substantial evidence "more than a mere scintilla. It means such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion." Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 (1971). [w]here there is such relevant evidence as reasonable minds might accept as adequate to support a conclusion even if it is possible to draw two inconsistent conclusions from the evidence. Landes v. Royal, 833 F.2d 1365, 1371 (9th Cir. 1987). http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/the-csi-death-dogs-sniffing-out-the-truth-behind-the-crimescene-canines-835047.html